Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36455236›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2023

Cerebrospinal fluid methylome-based liquid biopsies for accurate malignant brain neoplasm classification.

Jeffrey A Zuccato, Vikas Patil, Sheila Mansouri, Mathew Voisin, Ankur Chakravarthy, Shu Yi Shen, Farshad Nassiri, Nicholas Mikolajewicz, Mara Trifoi, Anna Skakodub and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Advances in the management of pediatric low-grade glioma.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey A ZuccatoMacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5418-8238
Vikas PatilMacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sheila MansouriMacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mathew VoisinMacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ankur ChakravarthyPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shu Yi ShenPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Farshad NassiriMacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicholas MikolajewiczORCID 0000-0002-7525-0384
Mara TrifoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anna SkakodubDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brad ZachariaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael GlantzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel D De CarvalhoDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alireza MansouriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7442-7539
Gelareh ZadehMacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6637-4502
University Health Network · CAPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Establishing the clinical utility of cell-free tumor DNA methylation profiling as a reliable liquid biopsy approach in brain tumorsR01CA263196 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI Daniel De Carvalho, Gelareh Zadeh · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA263196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResolving the differential diagnosis between brain metastases (BM), glioblastomas (GBM), and central nervous system lymphomas (CNSL) is an important dilemma for the clinical management of the main three intra-axial brain tumor types. Currently, treatment decisions require invasive diagnostic surgical biopsies that carry risks and morbidity. This study aimed to utilize methylomes from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), a biofluid proximal to brain tumors, for reliable non-invasive classification that addresses limitations associated with low target abundance in existing approaches.

methodsBinomial GLMnet classifiers of tumor type were built, in fifty iterations of 80% discovery sets, using CSF methylomes obtained from 57 BM, GBM, CNSL, and non-neoplastic control patients. Publicly-available tissue methylation profiles (N = 197) on these entities and normal brain parenchyma were used for validation and model optimization.

resultsModels reliably distinguished between BM (area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-1.0), GBM (AUROC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.63-1.0), and CNSL (AUROC = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.66-1.0) in independent 20% validation sets. For validation, CSF-based methylome signatures reliably distinguished between tumor types within external tissue samples and tumors from non-neoplastic controls in CSF and tissue. CSF methylome signals were observed to align closely with tissue signatures for each entity. An additional set of optimized CSF-based models, built using tumor-specific features present in tissue data, showed enhanced classification accuracy.

conclusionsCSF methylomes are reliable for liquid biopsy-based classification of the major three malignant brain tumor types. We discuss how liquid biopsies may impact brain cancer management in the future by avoiding surgical risks, classifying unbiopsiable tumors, and guiding surgical planning when resection is indicated.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBiomarkers, TumorBrainEpigenomeHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, Tumorbrain cancercerebrospinal fluiddiagnostic biomarkersDNA methylationliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36455236
PMCPMC10398815
OpenAlexW4310516388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.