ArticlePloS one2022
Are some interoceptive sensibility components more central than others? Using item pool visualisation to understand the psychometric representation of interoception.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Two weeks to tune in: Evaluating the effects of a short-term body scan on interoception.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Trial
- Self-reported interoceptive sensibility across eating disorder symptoms: associations with sociodemographic factors.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Interoceptive awareness is associated with enhanced neural response to unpleasant images.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- Understanding interoception across emotional contexts: development and validation of the Emotion-Linked Interoceptive Awareness Scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Attenuated heartbeat-evoked potentials in functional neurological disorder.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Sound effects on body perception vary with the social support network of individuals.iScience · 2025Article
- The Effect Emotion Regulation Difficulties on Interoceptive Awareness and Alexithymia: An Example of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.Psychiatry investigation · 2025Article
- Article
- Psychometric network analysis of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2) in Peruvian adults.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Respiratory sensitivity is reduced in functional neurological disorder and associated with higher somatoform dissociation.Brain communications · 2025Article
- The effect of 10-week long yoga training on interoceptive abilities: cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation of cardiac and gastric accuracy.Biologia futura · 2024Article
- Evaluating flourishing: a comparative analysis of four measures using item pool visualization.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Interoceptive awareness in a clinical setting: the need to bring interoceptive perspectives into clinical evaluation.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Assessment of the mind-body connection: preliminary psychometric evidence for a new self-report questionnaire.BMC psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interoception refers to the processing of stimuli originating within the body and is widely considered a multidimensional construct. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the definition and measurement of the subjective, self-reported component, referred to here as interoceptive sensibility. As a contribution to knowledge on the topic, we sought to examine the construct commonality and distinguishability of seven self-report measures of interoceptive sensibility using Item Pool Visualisation (IPV), an illustrative method that locates item pools from within the same dataset and illustrates these in the form of nested radar charts. Adults from the United Kingdom (N = 802) completed seven measures of interoceptive sensibility, and the data were subjected to IPV. Results demonstrated that, of the included measures, the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2 provided the closest and most precise measurement of the core interoceptive sensibility construct (i.e., core of the entire investigated item pool). The Body Awareness Questionnaire and the Private Body Consciousness Scale were also centrally located measures, while the Body Perception Questionnaire and the Body Responsiveness Scale appear to tap more distal aspects of the core construct. We discuss implications for interpreting complicated data patterns using measures of interoceptive sensibility and, more generally, for measuring the construct of interoceptive sensibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.