Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454990›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Assessing the interrelationship between stigma, social influence, and cervical cancer prevention in an urban underserved setting: An exploratory study.

Caryn E Peterson, J Andrew Dykens, Stevan M Weine, Hunter K Holt, Judes Fleurimont, Christina G Hutten, John Wieser, Fida Abuisneineh, Saria Awadalla, Natalia P Ongtengco and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Global cancer stigma research: a U.S. National Cancer Institute workshop report.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caryn E PetersonDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-9576
J Andrew DykensCollege of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Stevan M WeineCollege of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Hunter K HoltCollege of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6833-8372
Judes FleurimontMile Square Health Center, UI Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Christina G HuttenDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9957-5952
John WieserCollege of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Fida AbuisneinehMile Square Health Center, UI Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Saria AwadallaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Natalia P OngtengcoUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Nicole GastalaMile Square Health Center, UI Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Ian G JasenofMile Square Health Center, UI Health, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System · US

Funding

Research Education CoreU54CA202997 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$13.8M
Research Education CoreU54CA203000 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA, FEINGLASS, JOSEPH M · 2015 to 2024
$12.4M
The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC)U54CA202995 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY · PI HIBDON, JOSEPH EDWARD · 2015 to 2024
$9.5M
UIC Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health ProgramK12HD101373 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BUHIMSCHI, IRINA A, MAKI, PAULINE M · 2020 to 2023
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202995NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202997NCI NIH HHS U54 CA203000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the US, incidence and mortality from cervical cancer disproportionately affects racial/ethnic minorities and low-income women. Despite affordable access to primary and secondary prevention measures at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening rates are low, suggesting the presence of non-financial barriers to uptake in this population. This explanatory sequential mixed-methods study sought to explore factors that influence the acceptability of cervical cancer prevention services among parents and legal guardians of vaccine-eligible girls attending an urban FQHC and to assess social influences related to cervical cancer prevention. Participants included eight mothers, one father, and two grandparents/legal guardians. Nine participants self-identified as Black/Afro-Caribbean, or African American, two as Latinx, and one as Native American. The quantitative data suggested discordance between participants' cervical cancer prevention knowledge and their practices. Most indicated that their daughters had received the HPV vaccine but were unsure about HPV transmission modes. Qualitative data revealed that participants were comfortable disclosing information on HPV infection and vaccination status, and most women were likely to share information related to cervical cancer testing and diagnosis. Few comments indicated personal stigma on the part of participants, but there was frequent expression of perceived public stigma (shaming and blaming women), gender differences (men are indifferent to risk), and distrust of the healthcare system. Findings highlight several concepts including the disharmony between knowledge and practice, prevalent perceived public stigma, cumbersome attitudes on the part of men regarding HPV and cervical cancer, and distrust of the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleSocial StigmaPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36454990
PMCPMC9714950
OpenAlexW4310522098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.