Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454858›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

The use of 3D digital anatomy model improves the communication with patients presenting with prostate disease: The first experience in Senegal.

Babacar Diao, Ndèye Aissatou Bagayogo, Nayra Pumar Carreras, Michael Halle, Juan Ruiz-Alzola, Tamas Ungi, Gabor Fichtinger, Ron Kikinis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Babacar DiaoDepartment of Urology, Ouakam Military Hospital, Dakar, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0002-7869-0465
Ndèye Aissatou BagayogoDepartment of Urology, Ouakam Military Hospital, Dakar, Senegal.
Nayra Pumar CarrerasResearch Institute in Biomedical and Health Science, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.
Michael HalleDepartment of Radiology, Surgical Planning Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Juan Ruiz-AlzolaResearch Institute in Biomedical and Health Science, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3545-2328
Tamas UngiLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Gabor FichtingerLaboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6354-262X
Ron KikinisDepartment of Radiology, Surgical Planning Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7227-7058
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USQueen's University · CAUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESCheikh Anta Diop University · SN

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON, WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe hypothesized that the use of an interactive 3D digital anatomy model can improve the quality of communication with patients about prostate disease.

methodsA 3D digital anatomy model of the prostate was created from an MRI scan, according to McNeal's zonal anatomy classification. During urological consultation, the physician presented the digital model on a computer and used it to explain the disease and available management options. The experience of patients and physicians was recorded in questionnaires.

resultsThe main findings were as follows: 308 patients and 47 physicians participated in the study. In the patient group, 96.8% reported an improved level of understanding of prostate disease and 90.6% reported an improved ability to ask questions during consultation. Among the physicians, 91.5% reported improved communication skills and 100% reported an improved ability to obtain patient consent for subsequent treatment. At the same time, 76.6% of physicians noted that using the computer model lengthened the consultation.

conclusionThis exploratory study found that the use of a 3D digital anatomy model in urology consultations was received overwhelmingly favorably by both patients and physicians, and it was perceived to improve the quality of communication between patient and physician. A randomized study is needed to confirm the preliminary findings and further quantify the improvements in the quality of patient-physician communication.

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic DiseasesCommunicationHumansMaleModels, AnatomicSenegal

Identifiers

PMID36454858
PMCPMC9714841
OpenAlexW4310500721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.