Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454789›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Italian validation of the situational Brief Cope Scale (I-Brief Cope).

Ramona Bongelli, Alessandra Fermani, Carla Canestrari, Ilaria Riccioni, Morena Muzi, Alessia Bertolazzi, Roberto Burro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ramona BongelliDepartment of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3764-3929
Alessandra FermaniDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Carla CanestrariDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Ilaria RiccioniDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Morena MuziDepartment of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Alessia BertolazziDepartment of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Roberto BurroDepartment of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4491-2015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brief COPE (Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced) inventory is 14 faced scales used to assess coping strategies. It has been administered on different population samples and translated into several languages. Nonetheless, the Italian validation of its situational format is missing, and the present study aimed to fill this gap. To this end, the original English version of the scale was translated into Italian and administered to a sample of 682 Italian healthcare workers (HCWs), during the first wave of COVID-19. The Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA and CFA) were performed and led to the validation of the Italian Brief COPE (I-Brief COPE) scale, consisting of 21 items, loading properly on 6 factors, which range from activation (F1) to deactivation (F2), via social support (F3), humorous reframing (F4), religious/spiritual reliance (F5), substances use (F6). The six factors identified represent, according to our analyses, the relevant dimensions of coping in a stressful situation such as COVID-19. The results of this study reveal that the I-Brief Cope can be considered as a valid tool for measuring coping strategies in facing stressful, unpredictable, and damaging events.

Indexed as

COVID-19LanguageAdaptation, PsychologicalHealth PersonnelHumansSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID36454789
PMCPMC9714734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.