Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454761›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

The kinase occupancy of T cell coreceptors reconsidered.

Alexander M Mørch, Falk Schneider, Edward Jenkins, Ana Mafalda Santos, Scott E Fraser, Simon J Davis, Michael L Dustin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Mathematical models of TCR initial triggering.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. The kinase occupancy of T cell coreceptors reconsidered.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander M MørchKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FY, United Kingdom.
Falk SchneiderTranslational Imaging Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Edward JenkinsMedical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, and Medical Research Council Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom.
Ana Mafalda SantosMedical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, and Medical Research Council Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom.
Scott E FraserTranslational Imaging Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Simon J DavisMedical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, and Medical Research Council Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2280-1170
Michael L DustinKennedy Institute of Rheumatology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4983-6389
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00008/4Wellcome Trust 108869/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 207547/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensitivity of the αβ T cell receptor (TCR) is enhanced by the coreceptors CD4 and CD8αβ, which are expressed primarily by cells of the helper and cytotoxic T cell lineages, respectively. The coreceptors bind to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules and associate intracellularly with the Src-family kinase Lck, which catalyzes TCR phosphorylation during receptor triggering. Although coreceptor/kinase occupancy was initially believed to be high, a recent study suggested that most coreceptors exist in an Lck-free state, and that this low occupancy helps to effect TCR antigen discrimination. Here, using the same method, we found instead that the CD4/Lck interaction was stoichiometric (~100%) and that the CD8αβ/Lck interaction was substantial (~60%). We confirmed our findings in live cells using fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS) to measure coreceptor/Lck codiffusion in situ. After introducing structurally guided mutations into the intracellular domain of CD4, we used FCCS to also show that stoichiometric coupling to Lck required an amphipathic α-helix present in CD4 but not CD8α. In double-positive cells expressing equal numbers of both coreceptors, but limiting amounts of kinase, CD4 outcompeted CD8αβ for Lck. In T cells, TCR signaling induced CD4/Lck oligomerization but did not affect the high levels of CD4/Lck occupancy. These findings help settle the question of kinase occupancy and suggest that the binding advantages that CD4 has over CD8 could be important when Lck levels are limiting.

Indexed as

Major Histocompatibility ComplexT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicLymphocyte CountPhosphorylationsrc-Family Kinasessrc-Family Kinasescoreceptordiffusionfluorescencekinasessignaling

Identifiers

PMID36454761
PMCPMC9894195
OpenAlexW4310493692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.