Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454531›Full record

ReviewSpine deformity2023

Medical optimization of osteoporosis for adult spinal deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art evidence-based review of current pharmacotherapy.

Andrew S Zhang, Surya Khatri, Mariah Balmaceno-Criss, Daniel Alsoof, Alan H Daniels

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spine deformity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Personalized Approaches to Spine Surgery.International journal of spine surgery · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew S ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Surya KhatriWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Mariah Balmaceno-CrissWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Daniel AlsoofDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Alan H DanielsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. alandanielsmd@gmail.com.
Brown University · USLouisiana State University in Shreveport · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOsteoporosis is a common, but challenging phenomenon to overcome in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Several pharmacological agents are at the surgeon's disposal to optimize the osteoporotic patient prior to undergoing extensive reconstruction. Familiarity with these medications will allow the surgeon to make informed decisions on selecting the most appropriate adjuncts for each individual patient.

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted in PubMed from September 2021 to April 2022. Studies were selected that contained combinations of various terms including osteoporosis, specific medications, spine surgery, fusion, cage subsidence, screw loosening, pull-out, junctional kyphosis/failure.

resultsBisphosphonates, denosumab, selective estrogen receptor modulators, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab are all pharmacological agents currently available for adjunctive use. While these medications have been shown to have beneficial effects on improving bone mineral density in the osteoporotic patient, varying evidence is available on their specific effects in the context of extensive spine surgery. There is still a lack of human studies with use of the newer agents.

conclusionBisphosphonates are first-line agents due to their low cost and robust evidence behind their utility. However, in the absence of contraindications, optimizing bone quality with anabolic medications should be strongly considered in preparation for spinal deformity surgeries due to their beneficial and favorable effects on fusion and hardware compared to the anti-resorptive medications.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsOsteoporosisAdultBone DensityDiphosphonatesHumansTeriparatideBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesTeriparatideAdult spinal deformityComplicationsFusionHardwareOptimizationOsteoporosisOutcomesSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID36454531
OpenAlexW4310568243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.