Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454530›Full record

SynthesisSpine deformity2023

Current models to understand the onset and progression of scoliotic deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.

A R Meiring, E P de Kater, A Stadhouder, B J van Royen, P Breedveld, T H Smit

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Spine deformity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development and Assessment of a Novel Generic Finite Element Spine Model for Clinical Applications.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A R MeiringFaculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
E P de KaterFaculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5342-6721
A StadhouderDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8882-3842
B J van RoyenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6548-7214
P BreedveldFaculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-1657
T H SmitDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. th.smit@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8906-7433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo create an updated and comprehensive overview of the modeling studies that have been done to understand the mechanics underlying deformities of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), to predict the risk of curve progression and thereby substantiate etiopathogenetic theories.

methodsIn this systematic review, an online search in Scopus and PubMed together with an analysis in secondary references was done, which yielded 86 studies. The modeling types were extracted and the studies were categorized accordingly.

resultsAnimal modeling, together with machine learning modeling, forms the category of black box models. This category is perceived as the most clinically relevant. While animal models provide a tangible idea of the biomechanical effects in scoliotic deformities, machine learning modeling was found to be the best curve-progression predictor. The second category, that of artificial models, has, just as animal modeling, a tangible model as a result, but focusses more on the biomechanical process of the scoliotic deformity. The third category is formed by computational models, which are very popular in etiopathogenetic parameter-based studies. They are also the best in calculating stresses and strains on vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and other surrounding tissues.

conclusionThis study presents a comprehensive overview of the current modeling techniques to understand the mechanics of the scoliotic deformities, predict the risk of curve progression in AIS and thereby substantiate etiopathogenetic theories. Although AIS remains to be seen as a complex and multifactorial problem, the progression of its deformity can be predicted with good accuracy. Modeling of AIS develops rapidly and may lead to the identification of risk factors and mitigation strategies in the near future. The overview presented provides a basis to follow this development.

Indexed as

Intervertebral DiscKyphosisScoliosisHumansThoracic VertebraeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisBiomechanicsCurve progressionModelingPathogenesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.