ArticleUrolithiasis2022
Predictive factors for stone management timing after emergency percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in patients with infection and hydronephrosis secondary to ureteral calculi.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes and predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a retrospective analysis.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Retrograde ureteral catheterization under local anesthesia for emergency drainage in patients with infection and hydronephrosis secondary to ureteral calculi: Experience from a tertiary care hospital.Tzu chi medical journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the interval between stone management and emergency percutaneous nephrostomy drainage in patients with infection and hydronephrosis secondary to ureteral calculi. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 88 patients treated for 94 stones enrolled in this study from 2005 to 2020. The mean age was 60.7 ± 15.2 years (range: 2-87 years). The average stone size was 1.51 ± 0.8 cm (range: 0.4-4 cm). The most common location was the upper ureter (n = 71, 75.5%), followed by the lower (n = 17, 18.1%) and middle (n = 6, 6.4%) ureter. The mean interval between percutaneous nephrostomy drainage and secondary stone management was 8.17 ± 11.6 days (range: 1-76 days). Most patients underwent operations within 1 week (n = 72, 81.8%). Abnormal white blood cell counts were found in most patients (58, 65.9%). Tachycardia was detected in 40 (45.5%) patients. Only 11 (12.5%) patients had fever upon emergency department arrival. Severe shock was reported in 6 (6.8%) patients. More than half of all patients (45, 51.1%) experienced acute kidney injury, and 37 (42%) patients had elevated C-reactive protein levels. Most patients (69, 73.4%) received ureteroscopic lithotripsy as stone management. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was the only significant parameter (p = 0.016) affecting the operation interval, with MAP < 60 mmHg associated with longer operation intervals (16.2 days). The timing of stone surgery depends on clinician discretion and patient recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.