Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454335›Full record

SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2023

Treatment of actinic keratosis: a systematic review.

Brandon Worley, Vishnu Harikumar, Kelly Reynolds, McKenzie A Dirr, Rachel E Christensen, Noor Anvery, Michael D Yi, Emily Poon, Murad Alam

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Actinic keratosis metrics.Archives of dermatological research · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Is a 4 J/cmPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon WorleyDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vishnu HarikumarDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kelly ReynoldsDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
McKenzie A DirrDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rachel E ChristensenDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Noor AnveryDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael D YiDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Emily PoonDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Murad AlamDepartment of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. m-alam@northwestern.edu.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of actinic keratoses (AKs) can help lower the risk of eventual skin cancer and address field pre-cancerization. This review compares the different therapeutic options for actinic keratosis. Databases used include Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2019. Randomized control trials that were related to any approved or recognized treatment for actinic keratosis were included. 1186 studies were found, of which 80 with 6748 patients were included in the analysis. A network meta-analysis was not possible due to interstudy heterogeneity. The greatest degree of improvement was seen with photodynamic therapy (PDT) used adjunctively with other modalities, but this was not significantly different compared to other treatments. PDT, cryotherapy, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate (IMB), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), and ablative fractional laser (AFXL), were all non-inferior to one another in terms of percent clearance of AKs, but the lowest rates of clearance were seen with diclofenac sodium. When results were substratified by body site, 5-FU, combination PDT and combination 5-FU with calcipotriol were the most beneficial for AKs on the head and neck, although they often caused the highest proportion of initial side effects. Absence of randomized control trials for surgical treatments and non-ablative laser limits comparison of these treatments to other modalities. Limitations include the lack of standardized outcome reporting limited the comparability of results across trials. The results of this analysis do not account for individual patient risk or cumulative risk for development of skin cancer. At present, PDT, cryotherapy, imiquimod, IMB, 5-FU, TCA, AFXL, and combination treatments are similarly efficacious in reducing AKs in immunocompetent patients.Registration: N/A.

Indexed as

Keratosis, ActinicPhotochemotherapySkin NeoplasmsFluorouracilHumansImiquimodTreatment OutcomeFluorouracilImiquimodActinic keratosisSystematic reviewTreatment

Identifiers

PMID36454335
OpenAlexW4310567924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.