Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454290›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Assessment of pyloric sphincter physiology after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy using an endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe.

Stefanie Brunner, Florian Lorenz, Thomas Dratsch, Lorenz Schröder, Ulrich Toex, Benjamin Babic, Hans Friedrich Fuchs, Thomas Schmidt, Christiane Josephine Bruns, Tobias Goeser and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie BrunnerInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantat Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Florian LorenzInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas DratschDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lorenz SchröderUniversity of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ulrich ToexInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Benjamin BabicInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantat Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Hans Friedrich FuchsInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantat Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas SchmidtInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantat Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane Josephine BrunsInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantat Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Tobias GoeserInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Seung-Hun ChonInterdisciplinary Endoscopy Unit, Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantat Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Street 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. Seung-Hun.Chon@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8923-6428
University Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective of the studyThe most common functional complication after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is the delayed emptying of the gastric conduit (DGCE) for which several diagnostic tools are available, e.g. chest X-ray, upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and water-soluble contrast radiogram. However, none of these diagnostic tools evaluate the pylorus itself. Our study demonstrates the successful measurement of pyloric distensibility in patients with DGCE after esophagectomy and in those without it. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Between May 2021 and October 2021, we performed a retrospective single-centre study of all patients who had an oncological Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and underwent our post-surgery follow-up programme with surveillance endoscopies and computed tomography scans. EndoFlip™ was used to perform measurements of the pylorus under endoscopic control, and distensibility was measured at 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml balloon filling.

resultsWe included 70 patients, and EndoFlip™ measurement was feasible in all patients. Successful application of EndoFlip™ was achieved in all interventions (n = 70, 100%). 51 patients showed a normal postoperative course, whereas 19 patients suffered from DGCE. Distensibility proved to be smaller in patients with symptoms of DGCE compared to asymptomatic patients. For 40 ml, 45 ml and 50 ml, the mean distensibility was 6.4 vs 10.1, 5.7 vs 7.9 and 4.5 vs 6.3 mm

conclusionMeasurement with EndoFlip™ is a safe and technically feasible endoscopic option for measuring the distensibility of the pylorus. Our study shows that the distensibility in asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy is significantly higher than that in patients suffering from DGCE. However, more studies need to be conducted to demonstrate the general use of EndoFlip™ measurement of the pylorus after esophagectomy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsGastroparesisEsophagectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPylorusRetrospective StudiesDelayed gastric conduit emptyingEndoFlip™EsophagectomyGastroparesisPyloric distensibility

Identifiers

PMID36454290
PMCPMC10322758
OpenAlexW4310497569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.