Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454283›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Clinical features and response to systemic therapy in NRAS-mutant Chinese melanoma patients.

Jiuhong Wang, Hang Jiang, Fuxue Huang, Dandan Li, Xizhi Wen, Qiuyue Ding, Ya Ding, Xiaoshi Zhang, Jingjing Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiuhong Wang *Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-5260
Hang Jiang *Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Fuxue Huang *Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Dandan LiBiotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Xizhi WenBiotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Qiuyue DingBiotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Ya DingBiotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Xiaoshi ZhangBiotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Jingjing LiBiotherapy Center, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China. lijingj@sysucc.org.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong PT04180201Guangzhou Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission 20191A1515011263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe prognosis of patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma is rather poor. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy have revolutionized anti-tumor therapy, especially for melanoma. In this study, we retrospectively summarized the real-world experience of systematic treatment for NRAS-mutant melanoma patients in this new era. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe respective cohort included NRAS-mutant melanoma patients with metastatic or unresectable disease of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) from January 2018 to July 2022. The data about the clinical features and impact for systemic therapy of NRAS-mutant patients were collected and analyzed.

resultsAt data cutoff, 44 patients (19, 11, and 14 for acral, cutaneous, and mucosal ones, respectively) with NRAS-mutant were assessed. In addition, the median time of follow-up was 22.0 months. The immunotherapy-based combined treatment not only significantly improved the progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.006, HR 0.322), but was also accompanied by a higher objective response rate (ORR) (18.2%), disease control rate (DCR) (72.7%) than those of cytotoxic therapy or immunotherapy alone for advanced patients as first-line treatment. Nab-paclitaxel combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitor tended to produce better clinical benefit for the first-line treatment, especially for patients with acral melanoma. In addition, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with anti-PD-1 inhibitor also seemed to provide longer duration of response (DOR) for some patients. But combined therapy did not prolong the overall survival (OS) of NRAS-mutant patients. The combined therapy was well tolerated. Most adverse events were moderate and controllable.

conclusionIn conclusion, PD-1 inhibitor-based combined therapy increased clinical benefit for advanced patients with NRAS-mutant melanoma.

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsEast Asian PeopleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMembrane ProteinsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanAnti-PD-1 inhibitorChemotherapyCombination therapyNon-cutaneous melanomaNRASTKI

Identifiers

PMID36454283
PMCPMC11796726
OpenAlexW4310566140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.