Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36453849›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Scaling neighbor joining to one million taxa with dynamic and heuristic neighbor joining.

Philip T L C Clausen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 3 Biotech · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Philip T L C ClausenResearch Group for Genomic Epidemiology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8197-7520

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 874735Global Surveillance of Antimicrobial ResistanceNovo Nordisk Foundation NNF16OC0021856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithm is a widely used method to perform iterative clustering and forms the basis for phylogenetic reconstruction in several bioinformatic pipelines. Although NJ is considered to be a computationally efficient algorithm, it does not scale well for datasets exceeding several thousand taxa (>100 000). Optimizations to the canonical NJ algorithm have been proposed; these optimizations are, however, achieved through approximations or extensive memory usage, which is not feasible for large datasets.

resultsIn this article, two new algorithms, dynamic neighbor joining (DNJ) and heuristic neighbor joining (HNJ), are presented, which optimize the canonical NJ method to scale to millions of taxa without increasing the memory requirements. Both DNJ and HNJ outperform the current gold standard methods to construct NJ trees, while DNJ is guaranteed to produce exact NJ trees. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://bitbucket.org/genomicepidemiology/ccphylo.git. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

HeuristicsModels, GeneticAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID36453849
PMCPMC9805563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.