SynthesisCurationis2022
Effectiveness of school-based CPR training among adolescents to enhance knowledge and skills in CPR: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Curationis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Basic life support knowledge transfer from schoolchildren to family members and friends: a scoping review and preliminary conceptual framework for training implementation.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
- Article
- The effect of combined basic CPR training on knowledge, attitude, and bystander intervention: A pilot study to address obstacles in CPR education.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Training the Denmark national football teams in cardiopulmonary resuscitation - Part of the UEFA and ERC 'Get Trained, Save Lives' campaign.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Developing lifesaving skills in children: a simulation-based randomized controlled trial in schools.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on willingness to perform CPR among high school students.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- An analysis of freshmen's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the influencing factors at a university in Wuhu City: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Innovative Training Strategies for Public Response to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Review
- Article
- ChokeSafe: Empowering Children with Life-Saving Choking-Management Skills.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [Role of German cardiac arrest centers in mediating basic life support].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Article
- Comparison between a low-cost model (CPR Pillow) and a mannequin in training hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): A randomised trial.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- The Effects of Serious Games on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training and Education: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR serious games · 2024Review
- Virtual Reality for Basic Life Support Training in High School Students: Thematic Analysis of Focus Group Interviews.JMIR XR and spatial computing · 2024Article
- Six years of spreading BLSD skills in schools: empowering teachers as trainers.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Methods to teach schoolchildren how to perform and retain cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2023Review
- Closing the Gap: Addressing Racial Bias in Bystander CPR Administration.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation at a Selected Training Hospital in Namibia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrest is responsible for 5% - 10% of all deaths among children age 5-19 years; therefore, strategies to prevent poor outcomes post cardiac arrest among children are critical within schools.
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training on CPR knowledge and skills among adolescent school children.
methodThis systematic review was conducted and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The complete bibliographic databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched from January 2012 to August 2021. Included studies met all the eligibility criteria. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (EPHPP) and Mixed Method Appraisal tool were used to appraise the quality of the included studies.
resultsFourteen studies were included in the review, and 5418 participants were found in the databases. The studies were mainly conducted during the last decade, which suggests that the public's attention has been directed toward training schoolchildren in CPR. The most common interventions were taught in video simulation training courses. They also used subjective assessments to evaluate the participants' knowledge and skills.
conclusionFindings from this systematic review reveal that CPR training within school settings effectively promoted a change in CPR knowledge and skills among adolescents. Hence, continuous training of CPR among schoolchildren should be encouraged by policymakers, school authorities, parents and teachers to optimise the prompt usage of the skills in any cardiac event. However, a high-quality randomised controlled trial would enhance the strength of evidence in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.