Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36453717›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Human hippocampal responses to network intracranial stimulation vary with theta phase.

Sarah M Lurie, James E Kragel, Stephan U Schuele, Joel L Voss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah M LurieInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-688X
James E KragelDepartment of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
Stephan U SchueleDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, United States.
Joel L VossDepartment of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Mechanisms of hippocampal network-targeted stimulation to rescue memory impairment due to Alzheimer's diseaseR01NS113804 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI DISTERHOFT, JOHN F, VOSS, JOEL L · 2019 to 2023
$6.7M
The Role of Hippocampal Theta Phase in Human Memory EncodingF31MH125577 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LURIE, SARAH MARISSA · 2021 to 2022
$72k
NIMH NIH HHS F31MH125577NINDS NIH HHS R01NS113804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal-dependent memory is thought to be supported by distinct connectivity states, with strong input to the hippocampus benefitting encoding and weak input benefitting retrieval. Previous research in rodents suggests that the hippocampal theta oscillation orchestrates the transition between these states, with opposite phase angles predicting minimal versus maximal input. We investigated whether this phase dependence exists in humans using network-targeted intracranial stimulation. Intracranial local field potentials were recorded from individuals with epilepsy undergoing medically necessary stereotactic electroencephalographic recording. In each subject, biphasic bipolar direct electrical stimulation was delivered to lateral temporal sites with demonstrated connectivity to hippocampus. Lateral temporal stimulation evoked ipsilateral hippocampal potentials with distinct early and late components. Using evoked component amplitude to measure functional connectivity, we assessed whether the phase of hippocampal theta predicted relatively high versus low connectivity. We observed an increase in the continuous phase-amplitude relationship selective to the early and late components of the response evoked by lateral temporal stimulation. The maximal difference in these evoked component amplitudes occurred across 180 degrees of separation in the hippocampal theta rhythm; that is, the greatest difference in component amplitude was observed when stimulation was delivered at theta peak versus trough. The pattern of theta-phase dependence observed for hippocampus was not identified for control locations. These findings demonstrate that hippocampal receptivity to input varies with theta phase, suggesting that theta phase reflects connectivity states of human hippocampal networks. These findings confirm a putative mechanism by which neural oscillations modulate human hippocampal function.

Indexed as

CCEPhippocampushumaniEEGneurosciencephasestimulationtheta

Identifiers

PMID36453717
PMCPMC9733942
OpenAlexW4311150252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.