Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36453695›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2023

First-trimester glycaemic markers as predictors of gestational diabetes and its associated adverse outcomes: A prospective cohort study.

Robert J D'Arcy, Inez E Cooke, Michelle McKinley, David R McCance, Una M Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. First-trimester biomarkers of gestational diabetes mellitus: A scoping review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert J D'ArcyRegional Centre for Endocrinology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-4693
Inez E CookeRoyal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast, UK.
Michelle McKinleyCentre for Public Health, Queens University Belfast, UK.
David R McCanceRegional Centre for Endocrinology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Una M GrahamRegional Centre for Endocrinology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.

Funding

Public Health Agency Northern Ireland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with excessive fetal growth in later gestation. Recent data suggest accelerated growth may begin before 28 weeks' gestation when GDM is typically diagnosed. The identification of pregnancies at risk of early fetal growth would enable early intervention. We assessed the use of early pregnancy HbA1c in predicting excessive fetal growth. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWomen were recruited at antenatal booking from a major maternity unit in the UK. HbA1c was measured at <14 weeks gestation in 1243 women at risk of GDM as defined by UK NICE risk factors of whom 1115 underwent OGTT. Women with previous GDM were excluded. Comprehensive fetal ultrasound was performed at 28 weeks' gestation alongside 75 g OGTT in 976 of these women. GDM was defined using WHO criteria. Pregnancy outcomes were extracted from the regional maternity care database.

resultsTwo hundred and thirty-six women screened positive for GDM. At diagnosis, GDM pregnancies demonstrated higher adjusted fetal weight percentile than non-GDM pregnancies: (51.8 vs. 46.3, p = 0.008). This was driven by increases in the fetal abdominal circumference percentile in GDM compared with non-GDM pregnancies (55.3 vs. 46.2, p = <0.001). Early pregnancy HbA1c was higher in the GDM versus non-GDM group: (35.7 mmol/mol vs. 32.9 mmol/mol p = <0.01). A threshold for predicting excessive fetal growth was not identified in this cohort.

conclusionsAccelerated fetal growth is evident prior to the diagnosis of GDM. There remains a need for suitable methods of early identification of pregnancies at high risk for early accelerated fetal growth due to GDM. First-trimester HbA1c was not useful in identifying these pregnancies. NOVELTY STATEMENT: WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: Recent research suggests excessive growth associated with GDM may begin prior to 28 weeks' gestation, when GDM is typically tested for WHAT THIS STUDY HAS FOUND?: Pregnancies affected by GDM are already subject to accelerated fetal growth in comparison to non-GDM pregnancies by way of higher estimated fetal weight and fetal abdominal circumference Neither first-trimester HbA1c nor plasma glucose was useful predictors of these outcomes WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS STUDY?: Highlights the emergence of excessive growth prior to detection of GDM Reinforces need for suitable methods of identifying such pregnancies in earlier gestation.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalMaternal Health ServicesBirth WeightFemaleFetal WeightHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstProspective StudiesWeight Gainfetal growthgestational diabetes mellitusHbA1clarge for gestational agemacrosomiapreeclampsiapregnancy-induced hypertension

Identifiers

PMID36453695
PMCPMC10107539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.