Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36453486›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2023

Cone Beam CT Features and Oral Radiologist's Decision-making of Arrested Pneumatization of the Sphenoid Sinus.

Noura Alsufyani, Nouf Alsuayri, Raghad Alrasheed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noura AlsufyaniOral & Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nouf AlsuayriDental University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Raghad AlrasheedDental University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the demographic and radiographic features of arrested pneumatization of the sphenoid sinus (APS) and their influence on the confidence of oral and maxillofacial radiologists (OMFRs) in diagnosing APS.

methodsReports of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) APS were retrieved, and the demographic and radiographic features were retrospectively analyzed. Five OMFRs assessed the CBCT images and their confidence in diagnosing APS. The OMFRs' experience (years), expertise (skull-base CBCT cases/month) and diagnostic confidence level were analyzed for agreement and associations with demographic or radiographic features.

resultsOf 29 APS cases, 17 (58.6%) were females, and the mean age was 29.9±19 years. Twenty cases (69.0%) presented unilaterally, and 27 (93.1%) involved the sphenoid body. The most common accessory site was the pterygoid process (19, 65.5%). The vidian canal and foramen rotundum were involved in 27 (93.1%) and 17 (58.6%) cases, respectively. Most cases (28, 96.6%) were well-defined, corticated, and showed mixed attenuation. APS diagnostic confidence was higher among the expert OMFRs (72.4%-82.8% vs. 58.6%-62.1%).

conclusionRadiographic features differentiating APS from skull-base tumors were shown on CBCT. The confidence of OMFRs with similar experience in years depended on their frequency of examining CBCT cases involving the skull base.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographySphenoid SinusAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesSphenoid BoneYoung AdultAPScone beam CTdevelopmentdiagnostic imagingskull baseSphenoid sinus

Identifiers

PMID36453486
PMCPMC10288647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.