ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Topical interferon therapy in uveitic macular edema.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interferon as a novel agent for management of macular edema: Where do we stand?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Comment on: Efficacy and safety of posterior subtenon interferon alfa-2B injection in recurrent inflammatory macular edema.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Article
- Commentary: Topical interferon: A novel approach to uveitic macula edema.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate efficacy of topical interferon alfa-2b (IFN) in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (UME). Methods: This is a prospective, interventional case study of patients with UME. Injection IFN was reconstituted into eye drops and a four times/day (QID) application was prescribed. Central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan was evaluated. Improvement in CMT by ≥50 μm from the baseline was studied in eyes with presenting CMT ≥400 μm. Results: Twenty eyes of 20 patients with UME were studied: anterior uveitis (n = 3), anterior + intermediate uveitis (n = 5), posterior uveitis (n = 3), retinal vasculitis (n = 3), and panuveitis (n = 6). Mean CMT at the presentation was 423.3 μm (range: 270-604 μm), which improved at 1 month (n = 16), 2 months (n = 10), and ≥3 months (n = 11) follow-up, to 415.3 μm (range: 247-579 μm) (P = 0.411), 364.4 μm (range: 258-566 μm) (P = 0.099), 344 μm (range: 258-484 μm) (P = 0.001), respectively. Twelve eyes of 12 patients had presenting CMT ≥400 μm. In these cases, decrease in CMT by ≥50 μm was seen in 4/10, 4/5, and 5/6 eyes at 1 and 2 months and ≥3 months follow-up. Mean follow-up was 4 months (range: 1-17 months). Complete resolution of UME was seen only in three eyes. No ocular or systemic side effects were observed. Conclusion: Topical IFN therapy in QID doses is safe but may have limited role in UME. Long-term therapy may improve its efficacy. Larger studies with dose modification, combination with other drugs, and with homogeneous uveitis population are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.