ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex thickness analysis in patients having relative afferent pupillary defect.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual Field Indices or Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer? Predictors of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect Severity in Asymmetric Glaucoma.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in patients having relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 patients with posterior segment disease and glaucoma presenting with RAPD. The control group comprised 30 patients with the aforementioned diseases without RAPD. RAPD was graded using neutral density filters placed over the unaffected eye. Peripapillary RNFL thickness and macular GCC were measured using the Cirrus HD-OCT machine. Results: There were 45 males and 15 females. There was a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in the mean of average RNFL thickness in patients having RAPD (64.73 ± 15.16 μm in the affected eyes) as compared to sick control (82.73 ± 11.33 μm in the affected eyes). It was further observed that there was a decrease in RNFL thickness with advancing grades of RAPD. There was a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in the mean of average GCC thickness in patients having RAPD (51.57 ± 14.96 μm in the affected eyes) as compared to sick control (76.36 ± 8.06 μm in the affected eyes). Conclusion: Our study suggests that there is a significant reduction in RNFL thickness and GCC thickness in RAPD patients as compared to the sick control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.