ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Evaluation of antifungal susceptibility and clinical characteristics in fungal keratitis in a tertiary care center in North India.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status on antimicrobial resistance in keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Microbiological Spectrum, risk factors, and antifungal susceptibility of fungal keratitis in the Indore region of Central India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Pediatric Fungal Keratitis: Predisposing Factors, Clinical Features, and Outcomes During a 24-Year Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Fungal keratitis: Does antifungal Resistance Influence the outcome?International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- In Vitro Antifungal Activity of Amphotericin B-Encapsulated Silk Fibroin-Chitosan Nanoparticles AgainstPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Itraconazole Loaded Micelle Based on Methoxy Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Poly(D, L-Lactic Acid) for Ocular Drug Delivery: In vitro and in vivo Evaluation.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
- Association between in vitro susceptibility and clinical outcomes in fungal keratitis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2024Article
- Platelet-derived biomaterial controls aspergillus fumigatus keratitis by decreasing fungal burden: an in vivo study.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the antifungal susceptibility of common corneal pathogenic fungi to antifungal agents in the North Indian population. Methods: Prospective study of the antifungal sensitivity testing (natamycin, amphotericin B, voriconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, micafungin) of fungal isolates from 50 cases of culture positive fungal keratitis by using E test method. Details noted included demographic data, visual acuity, clinical details, grade of keratitis, healing time, and success in medical management. Results: Of 50 patients with fungal keratitis (mean age: 40.28 ± 16.77 years), 12 eyes healed within 3 weeks, 14 had a delayed healing response, and 24 had chronic keratitis. Among the 15 cases of Fusarium isolates, 93.3% were sensitive to natamycin, while 40% to amphotericin B; 66.6% to voriconazole, 13.4% to itraconazole and fluconazole each. 80% of Fusarium cases (n = 12) showed susceptibility to posaconazole. Among Aspergillus flavus isolates, 53.4% (n = 8) were sensitive to natamycin, with only 40% (n = 7) showing sensitivity to amphotericin B and good susceptibility to azoles. MIC against susceptible Fusarium spp. for natamycin was 3-16 μg/mL, amphotericin B: 1-8 μg/mL, voriconazole: 0.5-1.5 μg/mL, itraconazole: 0.5-12 μg/mL, posaconazole: 0.094-1.5 μg/mL. MIC against Aspergillus flavus was natamycin: 8-32 μg/mL, amphotericin B: 0.5-16 μg/mL, voriconazole: 0.025-4 μg/mL, itraconazole: 0.125-8 μg/mL, posaconazole: 0.047-0.25 μg/mL; against Aspergillus niger isolates, to natamycin was 6 μg/mL (n=1), amphotericin B 8-12 μg/mL (n = 3), voriconazole: 0.125-0.19 μg/mL (n = 3), itraconazole: 0.38-0.75 μg/mL, posaconazole: 0.064-0.19 μg/mL and against Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 1), was natamycin4 μg/mL, amphotericin B - 8 μg/mL, voriconazole 0.25 μg/mL, itraconazole 1 μg/mL, and posaconazole 0.19 μg/mL. MIC against susceptible Acremonium spp. for natamycin was 1.5-16 μg/mL, amphotericin B: 0.5-8 μg/mL, voriconazole: 0.19-3 μg/mL, itraconazole: 0.125 μg/mL, posaconazole: 0.125-0.5 μg/mL and against susceptible Curvularia was natamycin 0.75-4 μg/mL, amphotericin B 0.5-1 μg/mL, voriconazole 0.125-0.19 μg/mL, itraconazole 0.047-0.094 μg/mL, posaconazole 0.047-0.094 μg/mL. MIC against Mucor spp.+ Rhizopus spp. (n = 1) was natamycin: 8 μg/mL, amphotericin B: 0.75 μg/mL, posaconazole: 1.5 μg/mL. MIC against of Alternaria (n = 1) was voriconazole: 0.19 μg/mL, posaconazole: 0.094 μg/mL. MIC against Penicillium (n=1) was natamycin: 8 μg/mL, voriconazole: 0.25 μg/mL, itraconazole: 0.5 μg/mL, and Posaconazole: 0.125 μg/mL. Conclusion: Our observations highlight the variations in susceptibility to antifungal agents. Posaconazole seems to be effective with low MIC against common corneal pathogenic fungal isolates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.