Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36453104›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2023

Lianqun Qiu, Guilin Tang, Shaoying Li, Francisco Vega, Pei Lin, Sa A Wang, Wei Wang, Swaminathan P Iyer, Luis Malpica, Roberto N Miranda and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Haematologica · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2023
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lianqun QiuDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Guilin TangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Shaoying LiDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Francisco VegaDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Pei LinDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Sa A WangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Wei WangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Swaminathan P IyerDepartment of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Luis MalpicaDepartment of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Roberto N MirandaDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Sergej KonoplevDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Zhenya TangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Hong FangDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
L Jeffrey MedeirosDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Jie XuDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. jxu9@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DUSP22 rearrangement (R) has been associated with a favorable outcome in systemic ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). However, a recent study found that patients with DUSP22-R ALK-negative ALCL have a poorer prognosis than was reported initially. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with ALKnegative ALCL with DUSP22-R (n=22) versus those without DUSP22-R (DUSP22-NR; n=59). Patients with DUSP22-R ALCL were younger than those with DUSP22-NR neoplasms (P=0.049). DUSP22-R ALK-negative ALCL cases were more often positive for CD15, CD8, and less frequently expressed pSTAT3Tyr705, PD-L1, granzyme B and EMA (all P<0.05). TP63 rearrangement (TP63-R) was detected in three of the 66 (5%) ALK-negative ALCL cases tested and none of these cases carried the DUSP22-R. Overall survival of patients with DUSP22-R ALCL was similar to that of the patients with DUSP22-NR neoplasms regardless of International Prognostic Index score, stage, age, or stem cell transplantation status (all P>0.05), but was significantly shorter than that of the patients with ALK-positive ALCL (median overall survival 53 months vs. undefined, P=0.005). Five-year overall survival rates were 40% for patients with DUSP22-R ALCL versus 82% for patients with ALK-positive ALCL. We conclude that DUSP22-R neoplasms represent a distinctive subset of ALK-negative ALCL. However, in this cohort DUSP22-R was not associated with a better clinical outcome. Therefore, we suggest that current treatment guidelines for this subset of ALK-negative ALCL patients should not be modified at present.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseDual-Specificity PhosphatasesHumansImmunophenotypingMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase PhosphatasesPrognosisAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseDual-Specificity PhosphatasesDUSP22 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase PhosphatasesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID36453104
PMCPMC10230410
OpenAlexW4310565265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.