ArticleHaematologica2023
Article in Haematologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy for the treatment of front-line systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma: subgroup analysis of the ECHELON-2 study at 5 years' follow-up.Blood cancer journal · 2025Trial
- From molecular pathogenesis to novel Therapeutic approaches - a review of recent advances in the treatment of peripheral T cell Lymphomas.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Article
- ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma in pediatric and adolescent patients: a mini-review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Newborn mitochondrial DNA copy number is associated with changes to DNA methylation that persist into childhood and are associated with cognitive development.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Molecular Insights into the Diagnosis of Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: Beyond Morphology and Immunophenotype.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Clinicopathologic features of primary central nervous system anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a multicenter study identifies age and ALK status as prognostic factors.Journal of hematopathology · 2024Article
- Review
- Small cell pattern of ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma with double-hit rearrangements ofEJHaem · 2024Article
- Therapeutic challenges in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Pathobiology of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas: current understanding and future directions.Haematologica · 2023Review
- Updates in the Classification of T-cell Lymphomas and Lymphoproliferative Disorders.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2023Review
- Introduction to the peripheral T-cell lymphoma review series: advances in molecular characterization, classification refinement and treatment optimization.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Anaplastic large cell lymphomas with equivocal DUSP22 FISH results: recommendations for clinical reporting and diagnostic evaluation.Human pathology · 2023Article
- Article
- [Classification of peripheral T-cell lymphomas : News and open questions].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DUSP22 rearrangement (R) has been associated with a favorable outcome in systemic ALK-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). However, a recent study found that patients with DUSP22-R ALK-negative ALCL have a poorer prognosis than was reported initially. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with ALKnegative ALCL with DUSP22-R (n=22) versus those without DUSP22-R (DUSP22-NR; n=59). Patients with DUSP22-R ALCL were younger than those with DUSP22-NR neoplasms (P=0.049). DUSP22-R ALK-negative ALCL cases were more often positive for CD15, CD8, and less frequently expressed pSTAT3Tyr705, PD-L1, granzyme B and EMA (all P<0.05). TP63 rearrangement (TP63-R) was detected in three of the 66 (5%) ALK-negative ALCL cases tested and none of these cases carried the DUSP22-R. Overall survival of patients with DUSP22-R ALCL was similar to that of the patients with DUSP22-NR neoplasms regardless of International Prognostic Index score, stage, age, or stem cell transplantation status (all P>0.05), but was significantly shorter than that of the patients with ALK-positive ALCL (median overall survival 53 months vs. undefined, P=0.005). Five-year overall survival rates were 40% for patients with DUSP22-R ALCL versus 82% for patients with ALK-positive ALCL. We conclude that DUSP22-R neoplasms represent a distinctive subset of ALK-negative ALCL. However, in this cohort DUSP22-R was not associated with a better clinical outcome. Therefore, we suggest that current treatment guidelines for this subset of ALK-negative ALCL patients should not be modified at present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.