ArticleApplied clinical informatics2023
Laboratory Results Release to Patients under the 21st Century Cures Act: The Eight Stakeholders Who Should Care.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotype-Guided Antidepressant Prescribing for Patients With Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- The Use of ChatGPT-4.0 to Simplify Breast Pathology Reports: A Study on Readability and Accuracy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Proceedings of the Association for Pathology Informatics Bootcamp 2023: Ethics, equity, and regulations.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Electronic Patient Portals as a Modality for Returning Reclassified Genetic Test Results.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Timing of Liver Imaging Result Release Is Associated with Patients with Cirrhosis Reviewing Results Prior to Providers.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Ethical disclosure of biomarkers for Alzheimer risk in Latin American participants.Frontiers in dementia · 2025Article
- The hierarchy of needs for laboratory medicine requires a foundational care delivery model.Dialogues in health · 2024Article
- Behavior Shifts in Patient Portal Usage During and After Policy Changes Around Test Result Delivery and Notification.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- Unsolicited Patient Complaints Following the 21st Century Cures Act Information-Blocking Rule.JAMA health forum · 2023Article
- Establishing priorities for implementation of large language models in pathology and laboratory medicine.Academic pathologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major aim of the 21st Century Cures Act is to support patients' access to their electronic health data and to prevent information blocking practices by health care organizations and health information technology developers. Prior to the Cures Act, significant variation existed in patient access to laboratory test results, key pieces of health data which enable timely self-management and engagement in care. Although many health care systems began releasing test results immediately through patient portals because of the Cures Act, implementation remains challenging due to variations in state regulations around electronic results release, local interpretations of allowable exceptions to Cures information blocking, concerns about privacy of sensitive laboratory results, and technological limitations. This paper outlines the eight stakeholder groups involved in implementation of electronic laboratory result release to patients and describes recommendations for these groups to consider in achieving the Cures Act goals to support a patient's access to their health information and control of their health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.