ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022
Assessment of Olfaction Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the olfactory outcomes following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS) in patients diagnosed with Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) and Sinonasal polyposis (SNP). To assess and compare the pre-operative and post-operative olfactory scores of patients undergoing ESS/ ESS + polypectomy/ESS + Septoplasty by subjective and objective methods. This is a prospective, cohort study which included a total of 60 patients. Subjective assessment was done using a Questionnaire. Preoperative olfactory assessment was performed with Sniffing Sticks. Olfactory assessment was done at 1st,3rd, 6th and 12th week following surgery. The preoperative and postoperative scores were statistically analysed and compared. In patients who underwent ESS, there was a significant reduction in olfactory scores in the immediate few weeks after surgery which improved over time by the end of 3 months. In patients who underwent ESS with polypectomy, there was a significant improvement in olfactory scores from the third week following surgery which was sustained over 3rd month follow-up. In patients who underwent ESS with Septoplasy, there was a significant decrease in olfactory scores during the initial few weeks with a marginal improvement during 3 months follow-up. At the end of 12 weeks post ESS, no patient was found to be anosmic. Patients with pre-existing hyposmia did not show statistically significant change post surgery.However patients with anosmia showed statistically significant improvement in olfactory function, but did not become normosmic at 12th post-operative week. Majority of normosmics did not have alteration in their olfactory perception at 12th post-operative week.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.