Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36452664›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022

Usefulness of The Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in Surgical Planning.

Swetal Mahajan, B V Manjula, R Vaishnavi, Neena John, Bhuvaneshwari Babu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Critical Appraisal of the 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology with Cytohistological Concordance and Estimation of Risk of Malignancy - An Institutional Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Swetal MahajanDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560024 India.
B V ManjulaDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560024 India.ORCID 0000-0001-8823-0801
R VaishnaviDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560024 India.
Neena JohnPathology, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka India.
Bhuvaneshwari BabuDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560024 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) has attempted to standardize thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reporting internationally into six diagnostic categories and help in clinical decision making. But there exists a significant variation in the reporting percentage and rates of malignancies in each category across the centres which complicates clinical decision making. To study the usefulness of TBSRTC in surgical planning of thyroid nodules and to correlate TBSRTC with final histopathology. 85 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent surgery were evaluated prospectively. Preoperatively FNAC and TBSRTC reporting was done and following surgery histopathology was correlated with cytology. Distribution of 85 patients amongst the six categories of TBSRTC was as follows: 2.35% in Category I, 68.23% II, 7.05% III, 16.47% IV, 2.35% V and 3.52% VI. In 93% (79) of patients TBSRTC correlated with histopathology whereas in 7% (6) it did not. Risk of malignancy calculated was 0% in II, 33.33% in III, 7.14% in IV and 100% in V and VI categories. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value of TBSRTC was 100% for V, VI categories, whereas it was 100%, 78%, 15% and 100% respectively for III, IV. The diagnostic accuracy in our study is 100% for Category V and VI whereas it is 79% for Category III and IV. TBSRTC proved to be a very good screening platform for triaging patients with thyroid nodules into benign and malignant groups, as it is directly related to risk of malignancy in each category. It has helped in appropriate surgical planning in 96.4% of our patients.

Indexed as

ACR-TIRADSBethesdaFNACMalignancyThyroidectomyThyroid nodule

Identifiers

PMID36452664
PMCPMC9702001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.