Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36452613›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022

Reconstruction of Head and Neck Region with Supraclavicular Artery Flap.

Murat Ucak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Murat UcakPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Biruni University Hospital, 34010 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-2211
Biruni University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Although frequently used head and neck reconstruction methods are perforator flaps and free flaps, supraclavicular artery (SCA) flaps are newly used in skin defect reconstructions. In this study, we shared the experience of the SCA flap to evaluate whether there is a strong option in the head and neck. This prospective clinical cohort study of 28 patients, including 11 men, 12 women, and 5 children was performed between 2016 and 2020 years in the patients who were planned with SCA flap for burns, tracheostomy, or after malignant skin tumor of head and neck region. Seventeen of our patients were burnt, 8 malignant skin tumors, and 3 were used to repair the wound that did not heal after tracheostomy. In one patient, the tissues could not be closed primarily because the skin lost its elasticity due to a burn in the surrounding tissues. No flap necrosis dehisens or any other complications were seen and our patients were discharged with complete recovery. While only two patients stated moderate satisfaction orally, the other patients liked the result very much. On the other side, all the patients declared no loss of functionality following this SCA flap surgery. The SCA proved itself as a strong reconstructive flap for the head and neck, and has consistently demonstrated a reliable flap to provide a perfect color match. Level of Evidence: II, Randomized clinical cohort study.

Indexed as

BurnHeadNeckReconstructionSupraclavicular artery flapTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID36452613
PMCPMC9701935
OpenAlexW3106180084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.