ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022
Reconstruction of Head and Neck Region with Supraclavicular Artery Flap.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for postoperative vascular crisis in squamous cell carcinoma reconstruction using supraclavicular artery flaps.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Although frequently used head and neck reconstruction methods are perforator flaps and free flaps, supraclavicular artery (SCA) flaps are newly used in skin defect reconstructions. In this study, we shared the experience of the SCA flap to evaluate whether there is a strong option in the head and neck. This prospective clinical cohort study of 28 patients, including 11 men, 12 women, and 5 children was performed between 2016 and 2020 years in the patients who were planned with SCA flap for burns, tracheostomy, or after malignant skin tumor of head and neck region. Seventeen of our patients were burnt, 8 malignant skin tumors, and 3 were used to repair the wound that did not heal after tracheostomy. In one patient, the tissues could not be closed primarily because the skin lost its elasticity due to a burn in the surrounding tissues. No flap necrosis dehisens or any other complications were seen and our patients were discharged with complete recovery. While only two patients stated moderate satisfaction orally, the other patients liked the result very much. On the other side, all the patients declared no loss of functionality following this SCA flap surgery. The SCA proved itself as a strong reconstructive flap for the head and neck, and has consistently demonstrated a reliable flap to provide a perfect color match. Level of Evidence: II, Randomized clinical cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.