Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36452574›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022

Microscopic Parotidectomy: A Prospective Study.

Abhishek Bhardwaj, Rachit Sood, Manu Malhotra, Madhu Priya, Amit Kumar Tyagi, Amit Kumar, Saurabh Varshney, Arpana Singh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhishek BhardwajDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Rachit SoodDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Manu MalhotraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0913-6652
Madhu PriyaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Amit Kumar TyagiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Amit KumarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Saurabh VarshneyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology & Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
Arpana SinghDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the parameters' setting of the microscope during parotidectomy and the impact of microscopic parotidectomy on facial nerve functional status. A prospective study was conducted on 28 patients in a tertiary care center, who underwent microscopic parotidectomy. Microscope's settings' like magnification, focal length, diameter of the visualized field, and clock position were recorded. Facial nerve functional status was also recorded. All surgeries were performed by right-handed surgeons using Leica F 20 M525 microscope. Clock position of microscope for right parotidectomy ranged between 7 and 10 o clock and for left, it ranged between 7 and 12 o clock. Magnification ranged between 1.3 × and 3.2 ×; magnifications of 1.3 × and 1.8 × were preferred from incision to separation of parotid from sternocleidomastoid muscle, 1.8 × and 2 × for dissection of the facial nerve trunk, and 2 × and 3.2 × for individual branches of the facial nerve. Focal length ranged between 251 and 410 mm and the diameter of the visualized field ranged between 7 and 14.7 cm. Out of 24 cases of benign lesions, 2 (8.3%) developed facial paresis which resolved in 3 months. Two out of four cases of malignancy developed permanent palsy as nerve branches were sacrificed to achieve tumor clearance. Using a microscope for parotidectomy is advantageous for facial nerve dissection, reducing chances of facial paralysis. The microscope was also found to be useful for teaching. The use of appropriate microscopic parameters avoids the glitch of transition from open to microscopic approach.

Indexed as

Facial nerveMicroscopeParotidectomyParotid gland

Identifiers

PMID36452574
PMCPMC9702291
OpenAlexW3083294008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.