Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36452568›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2022

Role of Whole body PET/CT and Examination under anesthesia with multi-site biopsy in evaluating CUP.

Anupam Kanodia, Chirom Amit Singh, Pirabu Sakthivel, Shamim Ahmad Shamim, Kapil Sikka, Rajeev Kumar, Aanchal Kakkar, Rakesh Kumar, Siddhartha Datta Gupta, Ashu Seith Bhalla and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anupam KanodiaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.ORCID 0000-0002-3933-0416
Chirom Amit SinghDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.ORCID 0000-0002-6481-8093
Pirabu SakthivelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-9892
Shamim Ahmad ShamimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Kapil SikkaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Rajeev KumarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Aanchal KakkarDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Rakesh KumarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Siddhartha Datta GuptaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Ashu Seith BhallaDepartment of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Alok ThakarDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
Suresh C SharmaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the role of 18FDG-WBPET-CT, Examination under anesthesia (EUA), and multiple-site biopsy in detecting the occult site in head & neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HN-CUP). In this prospective study, 22 patients with diagnosed CUP, after a thorough outpatient endoscopic evaluation of upper airway and radiological evaluation (CT/MRI) that ruled out a primary lesion were included. These patients subsequently underwent whole-body PET-CT and EUA. Based on the presence of suspicious findings ( +) or their absence (-) on 18FDG-WBPET-CT (P) and EUA (E), we divided the patients into 5 groups: P-E-, P-E + , P + E-, P + E + , and P + or E + . All these patients underwent bilateral palatine tonsillectomy, bilateral nasopharyngeal biopsy, and ipsilateral lingual tonsillectomy for identification of occult primary. Out of 22 patients, the primary could be detected in 4 patients (18%) after the workup (three in the oropharynx and one in the hypopharynx, all ipsilateral). 18FDG-PET-CT suspected primaries in 7 patients; biopsy was positive for three (sensitivity-75%, specificity-77%, PPV-43%, NPV-93%). Out of 5 patients, who had suspicious findings on EUA, 3 of the biopsies revealed malignancy (sensitivity-75%, specificity-88%, PPV-60%, NPV-94%). Both PET-CT and EUA when combined, yield a NPV of 100% if both are negative and PPV of 100% when both are positive for suspicious findings. No primary was identified in the absence of a suspicion by PET-CT or EUA. Without a suspicion on 18FDG-WBPET-CT and EUA, there is a limited role of multiple-site biopsies in patients of HN-CUP.

Indexed as

Carcinoma of unknown primaryMetastatic cervical lymphadenopathyOccult primary of head and neckPositron emission tomographyTonsillectomy

Identifiers

PMID36452568
PMCPMC9702410
OpenAlexW3120279442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.