Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36452439›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Effect of hearing aids on cognitive functions in middle-aged and older adults with hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhizhong Yang, Jingnian Ni, Yuou Teng, Mingwan Su, Mingqing Wei, Ting Li, Dongsheng Fan, Tao Lu, Hengge Xie, Wei Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cognitive change in prevalent and incident hearing loss: The Maastricht Aging Study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhizhong YangDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jingnian NiDepartment of Neurology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yuou TengDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mingwan SuDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mingqing WeiDepartment of Neurology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ting LiDepartment of Neurology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dongsheng FanDepartment of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tao LuSchool of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hengge XieDepartment of Neurology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing ShiDepartment of Neurology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jinzhou TianDepartment of Neurology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to examine the effects of hearing aids on cognitive function in middle-aged and older adults with hearing loss. Data sources and study selection: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched for studies published before 30 March 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) were included in the search. Restriction was set on neither types, severity, or the time of onset of hearing impairment nor cognitive or psychiatric statuses. Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the study quality of RCTs. Cognitive function outcomes were descriptively summarized and converted to standardized mean difference (SMD) in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted in RCTs. Sub-group analyses were conducted by cognitive statuses, psychiatric disorders, and cognitive domains. Results: A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria, including five RCTs ( Conclusion: Hearing aids might improve cognitive performance in domains such as executive function in subjects without dementia. The effects on subjects with depressive symptoms remained unclear. No improvement was found in subjects with AD or dementia. Long-term RCTs and well-matched comparison-group studies with large sample sizes are warranted. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022349057.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasecognitive functiondepressionhearing aidshearing loss

Identifiers

PMID36452439
PMCPMC9704725
OpenAlexW4310602717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.