Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36452427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Decision-centered design of a clinical decision support system for acute management of pediatric congenital heart disease.

Azadeh Assadi, Peter C Laussen, Gabrielle Freire, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Patricia Trbovich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Azadeh AssadiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Labatt Family Heart Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter C LaussenInstitute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gabrielle FreireDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marzyeh GhassemiElectrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, United States.
Patricia TrbovichHumanEra, Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CABoston Children's Hospital · USNorth York General Hospital · CAVector Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD), have fragile hemodynamics and can deteriorate due to common childhood illnesses and the natural progression of their disease. During these acute periods of deterioration, these children often present to their local emergency departments (ED) where expertise in CHD is limited, and appropriate intervention is crucial to their survival. Previous studies identified that determining the appropriate intervention for CHD patients can be difficult for ED physicians, particularly since key components of effective decision making are not being met. Although key components of effective decision making for ED physicians have been identified, they have yet to be transformed into actionable guidance. We used decision centered design (DCD) to translate key components of decision making into decision requirements and associated design concepts, that we subsequently incorporated into a prototype clinical decision support system (CDSS). Methods: Using framework analysis, transcripts from Critical Decision Method interviews of CHD experts and ED physicians were inductively coded to identify key decision requirements for ED physicians that are currently not well supported, and their associated design concepts. A design workshop was held to refine the identified key decision requirements and design concepts as well as to sketch information that would satisfy the identified requirements. These were iteratively incorporated into a prototype CDSS. Results: Three decision requirements: (1) Conclusion: We identified key decision requirements and associated design concepts, that informed the design of a CDSS to provide actionable guidance for ED physicians when managing CHD patients. Meeting ED physicians' decision components with a CDSS requires the translation of their key decision requirements in its design. If not, we risk creating designs that interfere with clinician performance.

Indexed as

cognitive task analysiscongenital heart diseasedecision centered designdecision supportdigital healthemergency medicinemacrocognition

Identifiers

PMID36452427
PMCPMC9701701
OpenAlexW4309044101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.