Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36452367›Full record

ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2022

Microbiological cleaning and disinfection efficacy of a three-stage ultrasonic processing protocol for CAD-CAM implant abutments.

Peter Gehrke, Oliver Riebe, Carsten Fischer, Octavio Weinhold, Günter Dhom, Robert Sader, Paul Weigl

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter GehrkeDepartment of Postgraduate Education, Master of Oral Implantology, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-5615
Oliver RiebeHygCen Germany GmbH, Laboratory, Schwerin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-2115
Carsten FischerSirius Ceramics Laboratory, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0753-311X
Octavio WeinholdPrivate Practice for Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4701-0874
Günter DhomPrivate Practice for Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3339-2819
Robert SaderDepartment for Oral, Cranio-Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, Medical Center of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-0301
Paul WeiglDepartment of Prosthodontics and Head of Department of Postgraduate Education, Master of Oral Implantology, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7434-7988
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinikum Ludwigshafen · DEHelios Hospital Schwerin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComputer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) of implant abutments has been shown to result in surface contamination from site-specific milling and fabrication processes. If not removed, these contaminants can have a potentially adverse effect and may trigger inflammatory responses of the peri-implant tissues. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the bacterial disinfection and cleaning efficacy of ultrasonic reprocessing in approved disinfectants to reduce the microbial load of CAD-CAM abutments. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour different types of custom implant abutments (total N = 32) with eight specimens in each test group (type I to IV) were CAD-CAM manufactured. In two separate contamination experiments, specimens were contaminated with heparinized sheep blood alone and with heparinized sheep blood and the test bacterium Enterococcus faecium. Abutments in the test group were processed according to a three-stage ultrasonic protocol and assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by determination of residual protein. Ultrasonicated specimens contaminated with sheep blood and

resultsUltrasonic reprocessing resulted in a substantial decrease in residual bacterial protein to less than 80 µg and a reduction in microbiota of more than 7 log levels of CFU for all abutment types, exceeding the effect required for disinfection.

conclusionA three-stage ultrasonic cleaning and disinfection protocol results in effective bacterial decontamination. The procedure is reproducible and complies with the standardized reprocessing and disinfection specifications for one- or two-piece CAD-CAM implant abutments.

Indexed as

Bacterial decontaminationCAD-CAM abutmentsContaminationDisinfectionUltrasonic cleaning

Identifiers

PMID36452367
PMCPMC9672693
OpenAlexW4310602838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.