ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Is the six-minute walk test still reliable compared to cardiopulmonary exercise test for exercise capacity in children with congenital heart disease?
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Submaximal Field Walking Tests Applied in the Cardiopulmonary Assessment in Congenital Heart Diseases: A Systematic Review.Current pediatric reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative Analysis of Respiratory and Functional Outcomes in Children Post-Fontan Procedure Versus Healthy Peers.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Monitoring Activity and Gait in Children (MAGIC) using digital health technologies.Pediatric research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to assess the validity of the six-minute walk test (6MWT) to reflect the functional capacity of children with congenital heart disease (CHD), evaluate a possible correlation between the 6MWT distance with cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) variables, as well as to find a cutoff value to stratification the physical fitness in this population. Methods: We enrolled 459 children with CHD, 6-18 years old, who performed a complete CPET and 6MWT on the same day in a cross-sectional observational study. Correlations between variables of CPET and six-minute walking distance (6MWD) were analyzed and cutoff values of 6MWD were identified for the classification of the physical fitness in the population. Results: The mean distance ambulated during the 6MWT was 578 ± 65 m, 590 ± 65 m for boys, and 562 ± 62 m for girls ( Conclusions: Our study provided evidence on when a 6MWT should be considered as a convincing complementary test in the pediatric population with CHD and explored the classification of exercise tolerance using a 6MWD value. The cut-off values for 6MWD may be qualified as an intervention target for exercise rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.