ArticleDisease markers2022
Cuproptosis-Related LncRNA Signature for Predicting Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering cuproptosis with nanomedicine: Design, combination therapy, and translation in cancer.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Predicting prognosis and drug sensitivity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using an lncRNA signature associated with cuproptosis.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- The role of positive feedback loop between LINC00862 and RBM47 in hepatocellular carcinoma suppression.Genes & diseases · 2026Article
- Prognostic stratification in hepatocellular carcinoma using a telomerase-related lncRNA signature derived from TCGA database.PloS one · 2026Article
- Cuproptosis in lung cancer: a nexus of ncRNA regulation, epigenetics, and tumor microenvironment Remodeling.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- lncRNAs as prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cuproptosis-mediated cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Disulfidptosis‑related lncRNA prognosis model to predict survival therapeutic response prediction in lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Prognostic analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on cuproptosis -associated lncRNAs.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based disulfidptosis-related lncRNA signature predicts prognosis, immune infiltration and drug sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analyses of mitophagy-related genes and mitophagy-related lncRNAs for patients with ovarian cancer.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Current Status and Future Trends of Cold Atmospheric Plasma as an Oncotherapy.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2023Review
- Clinical Significance of Non-Coding RNA Regulation of Programmed Cell Death in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Cuproptosis is a novel mode of cell death that has only recently been discovered. Considering the critical role of lncRNAs in liver cancer development, the aim of this study was to construct a prognostic signature based on cuproptosis-related lncRNAs (CRlncRNAs). We downloaded RNA-sequencing data and corresponding clinical information of patients with HCC from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. To verify the robustness of the model, we added an external validation set obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO): GSE40144. In addition, we identified the cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) based on previous reports. Pearson correlation analysis, univariate Cox regression, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis were utilized to screen for genes associated with prognosis. On this basis, multivariate Cox regression and stepAIC were used to further construct and optimize the prognostic model. The simplified signature with the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) value was considered the prognostic signature. Seven different algorithms were used to perform immune infiltration analysis. The single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm was utilized to find the difference in immune function between the high- and low-risk groups. Finally, in vitro experiments were performed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis using HCC cell lines to validate the expression of prognostic genes. We identified 3 lncRNAs (CYTOR, LINC00205, and LINC01184) as independent risk factors for HCC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves calculated that the AUC at 1, 3, and 5 years reached 0.717, 0.633, and 0.607, respectively. The expression levels of 41 immune checkpoints differed significantly between the high- and low-risk groups, and there were significant differences in sensitivity to immunotherapy between the high- and low-risk groups. The risk model could also serve as a promising predictor of immunotherapeutic response, which has been verified by the TIDE algorithm (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.