ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Correlation between estimated glucose disposal rate and in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention in individuals with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between diabetes mellitus and primary restenosis following endovascular treatment: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Pooled it
- Low estimated glucose disposal rate predicts high residual syntax score in non-diabetic ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Estimated glucose disposal rate and the risk of major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular outcomes and mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- The association of abdominal obesity with the incidence of in-stent restenosis and thrombosis.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2025Article
- Estimated glucose disposal rate for predicting cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Usefulness of estimated glucose disposal rate in detecting heart failure: results from national health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2018.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate with Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Integrated for Prognosticating Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events and Risk Stratification Among Acute Coronary Syndrome with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- SGLT2 inhibitor improves the prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease and prevents in-stent restenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is closely associated with in-stent restenosis (ISR) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Nevertheless, the predictive power of the newly developed simple assessment method for IR, estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), for ISR after PCI in individuals with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) remains unclear. Methods: NSTE-ACS cases administered PCI in Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January and December 2015 were enrolled. The included individuals were submitted to at least one coronary angiography within 48 months after discharge. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to ISR occurrence or absence. eGDR was derived as 21.16 - (0.09 * waist circumference [cm]) - (3.41 * hypertension) - (0.55 * glycated hemoglobin [%]). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed for evaluating eGDR's association with ISR. Results: Based on eligibility criteria, 1218 patients were included. In multivariate logistic analysis, the odds ratios (ORs) of eGDR as a nominal variate and a continuous variate were 3.393 (confidence interval [CI] 2.099 - 5.488, P < 0.001) and 1.210 (CI 1.063 - 1.378, P = 0.004), respectively. The incremental effect of eGDR on ISR prediction based on traditional cardiovascular risk factors was reflected by ROC curve analysis (AUC: baseline model + eGDR 0.644 vs. baseline model 0.609, P for comparison=0.013), continuous net reclassification improvement (continuous-NRI) of -0.264 (p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of 0.071 (p = 0.065). Conclusion: In NSTE-ACS cases administered PCI, eGDR levels show an independent negative association with increased ISR risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.