ReviewBJR open2022
Statistical considerations for repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative imaging biomarkers.
Review in BJR open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Novel cell markers with altered expression in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease: A review.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Technical Development and Implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the Brain: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 0/1 Technology Development Report.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- [Effect of AI-assisted compressed sensing acceleration on MRI radiomic feature extraction and staging model performance for nasopharyngeal carcinoma].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Deep learning models for deriving optimised measures of fat and muscle mass from MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Novel spin-lock time sampling strategies for improved reproducibility in quantitative T1ρ mapping.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- High-frequency Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging of Human Rotator Cuff Muscles: Assessment of Repeatability and Reproducibility.Ultrasonic imaging · 2024Article
- [ROC curves: general characteristics and their usefulness in clinical practice].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) are increasingly used in clinical studies. Because many QIBs are derived through multiple steps in image data acquisition and data analysis, QIB measurements can produce large variabilities, posing a significant challenge in translating QIBs into clinical trials, and ultimately, clinical practice. Both repeatability and reproducibility constitute the reliability of a QIB measurement. In this article, we review the statistical aspects of repeatability and reproducibility of QIB measurements by introducing methods and metrics for assessments of QIB repeatability and reproducibility and illustrating the impact of QIB measurement error on sample size and statistical power calculations, as well as predictive performance with a QIB as a predictive biomarker.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.