Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451972›Full record

ReviewBioscience2022

Monarch Butterfly Ecology, Behavior, and Vulnerabilities in North Central United States Agricultural Landscapes.

Tyler J Grant, Kelsey E Fisher, Niranjana Krishnan, Alexander N Mullins, Richard L Hellmich, Thomas W Sappington, James S Adelman, Joel R Coats, Robert G Hartzler, John M Pleasants and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tyler J GrantResearch scientist, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Kelsey E FisherPostdoctoral scholar, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9279-667X
Niranjana KrishnanMissouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri.
Alexander N MullinsGraduate student, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Richard L HellmichIowa State University, Ames, Iowa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8687-1629
Thomas W SappingtonIowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
James S AdelmanUniversity of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Joel R CoatsIowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Robert G HartzlerIowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
John M PleasantsIowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
Steven P BradburyIowa State University, Ames, Iowa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-045X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The North American monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is a candidate species for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Multiple factors are associated with the decline in the eastern population, including the loss of breeding and foraging habitat and pesticide use. Establishing habitat in agricultural landscapes of the North Central region of the United States is critical to increasing reproduction during the summer. We integrated spatially explicit modeling with empirical movement ecology and pesticide toxicology studies to simulate population outcomes for different habitat establishment scenarios. Because of their mobility, we conclude that breeding monarchs in the North Central states should be resilient to pesticide use and habitat fragmentation. Consequently, we predict that adult monarch recruitment can be enhanced even if new habitat is established near pesticide-treated crop fields. Our research has improved the understanding of monarch population dynamics at the landscape scale by examining the interactions among monarch movement ecology, habitat fragmentation, and pesticide use.

Indexed as

habitat connectivitymonarch butterfly conservationmovement ecologypesticide toxicologyspatially explicit agent-based modeling

Identifiers

PMID36451972
PMCPMC9699720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.