ArticleJournal of translational autoimmunity2022
Mycophenolate mofetil as second line treatment in autoimmune hepatitis - A retrospective single center analysis.
Article in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Effectiveness of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Tacrolimus as a Second-Line Therapy for Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026Pooled it
- Autoimmune hepatitis in children: Guidelines of the Indian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ISPGHAN).Hepatology international · 2025Guideline
- Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine as a first-line treatment for autoimmune hepatitis: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- MMF Is an Effective and Safer Treatment Options for Treatment-Naïve Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis Compared to Azathioprine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of digestive diseasesPooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil Compared to Azathioprine in Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterology research · 2025Article
- The Role of Novel Immunomodulators in the Treatment of Autoimmune Hepatitis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025Review
- Cytopenias in Autoimmune Liver Diseases-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Autoimmune hepatitis: Towards a personalized treatment.World journal of hepatology · 2024Review
- AIH Therapy: Beyond First‑Line.Current hepatology reports · 2024Article
- Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver (HASL): revised clinical practice guidelines for autoimmune hepatitis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most patients with autoimmune hepatitis respond to standard treatment with steroids and azathioprine. While the disease is usually fatal if untreated, patients who respond well to therapy have an excellent prognosis. Nevertheless, second-line treatment is necessary in approximately 20% of patients, due to either intolerance or insufficient response to first line treatment.While data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients intolerant to azathioprine is encouraging, MMF seems of less benefit in patients with insufficient response to first line treatment, but analyzed data on this issue is limited. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a monocentric database of AIH patients who received medical care from 2000 to 2022. Clinical, immunological and biochemical parameters were assessed at different time points including last follow-up. Results: Overall, 144 patients with AIH were identified. Fifty out of 144 (35%) AIH patients received MMF. Forty (80%) received MMF due to first line treatment intolerance, while ten (20%) due to insufficient response to first line treatment.Remission with MMF monotherapy was 81.5% in the intolerance group versus 30% in the insufficient response group. Patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response, more often needed additional prednisolone doses higher than 5 mg/day, a switch to third-line treatment or combination regiments, to achieve disease control. Conclusions: Patients treated with MMF because of intolerance to first line treatment show a good disease control under MMF in the majority of cases. Efficacy is considerably lower in the patients switched to MMF because of an insufficient response to first line treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.