Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451926›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Machine learning outperforms traditional logistic regression and offers new possibilities for cardiovascular risk prediction: A study involving 143,043 Chinese patients with hypertension.

Yang Xi, Hongyi Wang, Ningling Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang XiDepartment of Hypertension, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongyi WangDepartment of Hypertension, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ningling SunDepartment of Hypertension, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying people at risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is a cornerstone of preventive cardiology. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms and investigated their performance in predicting patients' current CVD risk (coronary heart disease and stroke in this study). Materials and methods: We compared traditional logistic regression (LR) with five ML algorithms LR with Elastic-Net, Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Machine, Deep Learning, and an Ensemble model averaging predictions from RF, XGB, and Deep Learning for CVD risk prediction using pre-existing patient-level data from a multi-center, cross-sectional study (the Microalbuminuria Screening in Hypertensive Patients Project initiated by the China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Healthcare) that enrolled 143,043 patients with hypertension from 600 tertiary, secondary, or community hospitals. Each of the five ML algorithms incorporated 18 variables, such as demographics, examinations, comorbidities, and treatment regimens, and were trained and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Predictive accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Results: Patients' mean age was 62 ± 12 years and 57% were men. Advanced ML algorithms outperformed the traditional LR model. Particularly, the Ensemble model had superior discrimination with an AUROC of 0.760 than LR (AUC = 0.737) and other tested models. Conclusion: We establishes an Ensemble model that shows better performance in predicting patients' current CVD risk using routine information compared to the traditional LR model. ML can help physicians design follow-up plans with more accurate results, offering new possibilities for short-term risk prediction and early detection. Further, ML models can be trained with longitudinal data and used to predict long-term CVD risks, thereby informing CVD prevention.

Indexed as

CVDhypertensionmachine learningrisk predictiontraditional logistic regression

Identifiers

PMID36451926
PMCPMC9701715
OpenAlexW4309043532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.