ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Machine learning outperforms traditional logistic regression and offers new possibilities for cardiovascular risk prediction: A study involving 143,043 Chinese patients with hypertension.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying the Predictive Power of Social Determinants of Health in Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Progression Using XGBoost: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Applications for Risk Stratification in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A New Era in Cardiology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine learning models for predicting postoperative paraplegia in acute type A aortic dissection patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Predicting adverse outcomes in dilated cardiomyopathy using 3D echocardiography: penalised Cox regression versus machine learning.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence improves risk stratification for breast cancer recurrence and mortality in women exposed to pesticides: a call for reassessment of stratification criteria.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a deep neural network for predicting coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Construction of a classification model for dementia among Brazilian adults aged 50 and over.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Development and Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Chinese COPD Patients: An Analysis of the CHARLS Database.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- PrevCardioOncAI: Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease in Cancer Survivors.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Urban and rural disparities in stroke prediction using machine learning among Chinese older adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- A prediction study on the occurrence risk of heart disease in older hypertensive patients based on machine learning.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Construction of a predictive model for cognitive impairment among older adults in Northwest China.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
- Determinants of Visual Impairment Among Chinese Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Risk Prediction Model Using Machine Learning Algorithms.JMIR aging · 2024Article
- A Random Forest Algorithm for Assessing Risk Factors Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease: Observational Study.Asian/Pacific Island nursing journal · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a cardiovascular risk prediction model for Sri Lankans using machine learning.PloS one · 2024Article
- Combinatorial Use of Machine Learning and Logistic Regression for Predicting Carotid Plaque Risk Among 5.4 Million Adults With Fatty Liver Disease Receiving Health Check-Ups: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Identifying people at risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) is a cornerstone of preventive cardiology. We developed machine learning (ML) algorithms and investigated their performance in predicting patients' current CVD risk (coronary heart disease and stroke in this study). Materials and methods: We compared traditional logistic regression (LR) with five ML algorithms LR with Elastic-Net, Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Machine, Deep Learning, and an Ensemble model averaging predictions from RF, XGB, and Deep Learning for CVD risk prediction using pre-existing patient-level data from a multi-center, cross-sectional study (the Microalbuminuria Screening in Hypertensive Patients Project initiated by the China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Healthcare) that enrolled 143,043 patients with hypertension from 600 tertiary, secondary, or community hospitals. Each of the five ML algorithms incorporated 18 variables, such as demographics, examinations, comorbidities, and treatment regimens, and were trained and evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Predictive accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Results: Patients' mean age was 62 ± 12 years and 57% were men. Advanced ML algorithms outperformed the traditional LR model. Particularly, the Ensemble model had superior discrimination with an AUROC of 0.760 than LR (AUC = 0.737) and other tested models. Conclusion: We establishes an Ensemble model that shows better performance in predicting patients' current CVD risk using routine information compared to the traditional LR model. ML can help physicians design follow-up plans with more accurate results, offering new possibilities for short-term risk prediction and early detection. Further, ML models can be trained with longitudinal data and used to predict long-term CVD risks, thereby informing CVD prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.