Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451896›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2022

Telemedicine and gynecologic oncology: caring for patients remotely during a global pandemic.

Janice Wong, Rafael Gonzalez, Benjamin Albright, Taylor Hayes, Anthony Swartz, Laura J Havrilesky, Paula S Lee, Rebecca A Previs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janice WongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).
Rafael GonzalezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).
Benjamin AlbrightDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).
Taylor HayesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).
Anthony SwartzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).
Laura J HavrileskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).
Paula S LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).
Rebecca A PrevisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC (Dr Wong, Dr Gonzalez, Dr Albright, Ms Hayes, Mr Swartz, Dr Havrilesky, Dr Lee, and Dr Previs).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine uses technology to deliver medical care remotely and has been shown to provide similar patient satisfaction and care outcomes compared with in-person visits.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the gynecologic oncology patient telehealth experience. STUDY

designAll patients receiving telehealth care between March 23, 2020, to May 14, 2020, from a single institution's gynecologic oncology division were offered postvisit surveys to assess satisfaction. Basic demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. Patient zip code data were correlated with Community Need Index scores and visualized using heat maps.

resultsOf 286 telehealth visits, 112 postvisit surveys (39.2%) were collected. Survey responses demonstrated high patient satisfaction with responders agreeing that privacy was respected (97.3%), diagnosis and treatment options were adequately explained (92%), they could easily ask questions (97.3%), and they established a good rapport with their provider (96.4%). Additional benefits included reduced travel (92.9%), time (83.0%), cost (67.9%), and family interruption (57.1%). Among 11 patients receiving treatment on a clinical trial, 10 (90.9%) were able to continue on trial without disruption. Most responders (87.5%) preferred future visits to occur via telehealth or a mixture of telehealth and in-person visits. No difference in satisfaction was found among patients residing in zip codes associated with higher Community Need Index scores or increased distance from the institution.

conclusionThe use of telemedicine in providing gynecologic oncology care was associated with high patient satisfaction and had the benefits of reduced time, cost, travel, and interruption to family time.

Indexed as

community needsgynecologic oncologyhealthcare accessheat mappatient satisfactiontelecommunicationtelehealthtelemedicinetelevideo

Identifiers

PMID36451896
PMCPMC9703802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.