Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451840›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Sputum neutrophil counts in healthy subjects: relationship with age.

Augusta Beech, Dave Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Augusta BeechDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2690-5364
Dave SinghDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A threshold of ∼60% has commonly been used in asthma and COPD studies to define the presence of neutrophilic airway inflammation. This threshold is based on relatively young healthy subject datasets. However, age-related increases in sputum neutrophils have been observed previously. We used a healthy cohort, with a comparatively wider age range, to re-evaluate the age-related increase in sputum neutrophils, analysing changes by decade. We also studied the long-term repeatability of sputum neutrophil counts. Differential sputum cell count data for healthy subjects (n=121) was retrospectively analysed. Subjects with a repeated count (mean interval 4.8 years) were included in longitudinal analysis. There was a significant positive association between age and sputum neutrophil % (rho=0.24, p<0.01), with 51.2% of subjects having a sputum neutrophil count >60%. Sputum neutrophil counts increased with each decade until ∼60 years where a plateau was observed. The baseline sputum neutrophil % increased significantly at repeated sampling (p=0.02), with excellent long-term repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.80). We confirm previous reports of an age-related increase in sputum neutrophil % in healthy individuals and identified a plateau which occurs at age ∼60 years. There was an increase in sputum neutrophil % during longitudinal follow-up, indicating that age-related neutrophilia is a progressive phenomenon. These findings question the use of an unadjusted threshold, in relation to age, to identify the presence of neutrophilic airway inflammation.

Identifiers

PMID36451840
PMCPMC9703149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.