Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2022

The development of a Self-Rated ICF-based questionnaire (HEAR-COMMAND Tool) to evaluate Hearing, Communication, and Conversation disability: Multinational experts' and patients' perspectives.

Tahereh Afghah, Razan Alfakir, Markus Meis, Lisette van Leeuwen, Sophia E Kramer, Mahmoud Hammady, Mostafa Youssif, Kirsten C Wagener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tahereh AfghahHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Germany and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Oldenburg, Germany.
Razan AlfakirDepartment of Speech-Language and Hearing Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States.
Markus MeisHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Germany and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Oldenburg, Germany.
Lisette van LeeuwenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sophia E KramerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mahmoud HammadyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiovestibular Medicine Division, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt.
Mostafa YoussifDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiovestibular Medicine Division, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt.
Kirsten C WagenerHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Germany and Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: An instrument that facilitates the advancement of hearing healthcare delivery from a biomedical model to a biopsychosocial one that underpins the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework (ICF) brief and comprehensive Core Sets for Hearing Loss (CSHL) is currently unavailable. The objective is to describe the process of developing and validating a new questionnaire named the Design: A team from Germany, the USA, the Netherlands, and Egypt collaborated on development. The following ICF domains were considered; "Body Functions" (BF), "Activities and Participation" (AP), and "Environmental Factors" (EF). The development yielded English, German, and Arabic versions. A pilot validation study with a total of 109 respondents across three countries, Germany, Egypt, and the USA was conducted to revise the item terminology according to the feedback provided by the respondents. Results: The questionnaire included a total of 120 items. Ninety items were designed to collect information on the functioning and 30 items inquiring about demographic information, hearing status, and Personal Factors. Except for the "Body Structures" (BS) domain, all the categories of the brief ICF CSHL were covered (a total of 85% of the categories). Moreover, the items covered 44% of the comprehensive ICF CSHL categories including 73% of BF, 55% of AP, and 27% of EF domains. Overall, the terminology of 24 ICF-based items was revised based on the qualitative analysis of the respondents' feedback to further clarify the items that were found tod be unclear or misleading. The tool highlighted the broad connection of HL with bodily health and contextual factors. Conclusions: The

Indexed as

communication disabilityhearing impairmenthearing loss questionnaireICF core sets for hearing lossInternational Classification of Functioning disability and healthoutcome measure

Identifiers

PMID36451803
PMCPMC9701723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.