ArticleSAGE open medicine2022
A retrospective evaluation of drug-drug interactions in patients admitted to Internal Medicine Departments in Palestinian Hospitals.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A single-centre retrospective evaluation of potential drug-drug interactions in breast cancer patients undergoing CDK 4/6 inhibitors chemotherapy.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To measure the prevalence and identify risk factors associated with drug-drug interactions among patients admitted to internal medicine departments in Palestinian hospitals. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted. Data were obtained from patient files from the internal medicine departments in Palestinian hospitals from 1 September 2017, to 31 March 2018. The data collected included patient gender, age, length of hospitalization, medications prescribed, and the number of medications. The digital clinical decision support system IBM Micromedex Results: The number of patients included in this study is 513. The total number of potential drug-drug interactions detected in study participants is 1558. The average number of potential drug-drug interactions per patient was found to be 3 ± 3.9. Among study participants, 66.1% (n = 339) were found to have potential drug-drug interactions in their current medications. The most commonly encountered drug-drug interactions type was "major" drug-drug interaction, which was encountered in 43.6% (n = 681) of total detected drug-drug interactions. Other types of drug-drug interactions were encountered in 42% (n = 647), 14% (n = 224), and 0.4% (n = 6) which were moderate, minor, and contraindicated drug-drug interactions, respectively. Patients' age, number of medications, and length of hospitalization were associated with the increased risk of potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusion: The results indicated a high prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions in Palestinian hospitals, associated with polypharmacy, increased age, and increased length of hospitalization. Therefore, managing patient medication by a drug expert such as a clinical pharmacist to identify and resolve potential drug-drug interactions will possibly decrease the high prevalence of drug-drug interactions, prevent patient harm, and decrease the cost of hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.