Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Useful functional recovery and quality of life after surgical treatment of peroneal nerve injuries.

Lukas Rasulić, Živan Nikolić, Milan Lepić, Andrija Savić, Filip Vitošević, Nenad Novaković, Stefan Radojević, Aleksa Mićić, Sanja Lepić, Stefan Mandić-Rajčević

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas RasulićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Živan NikolićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan LepićClinic for Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Andrija SavićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Filip VitoševićCenter for Radiology and MRI, Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nenad NovakovićClinic for Neurosurgery, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stefan RadojevićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksa MićićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Sanja LepićFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Stefan Mandić-RajčevićSchool of Public Health and Health Management and Institute of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSMilitary Medical Academy · RSCentar za Promociju Nauke · RSUniversity of Defence · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closed injuries to the peroneal nerve recover spontaneously in about a third of patients, but surgery may be needed in the remaining 2/3. The recovery after surgery is not always satisfactory and the patients may need an orthosis or a walking aid to cope with regular daily activities. This study aimed to evaluate the useful functional recovery and quality of life (QoL) in surgically treated patients with peroneal nerve (PN) injuries. The study involved 51 patients who have undergone surgical treatment due to PN injury in our department, within a 15-year period (2006-2020). Thirty patients (59%) were treated with neurolysis, 12 (23%) with nerve repair techniques, and 9 (18%) with tendon transfer (TT). Neurolysis is employed in the least extensive nerve injuries when nerve continuity is preserved and yields a motor recovery ratio of almost 80%. Nerve repairs were followed by 58.33% of patients achieving M3+ recovery, while 41.66% recovered to the useful functional state (M4 or M5) With the use of TTs, all patients recovered to the M3+, while 66.7% recovered to M4. All our results correspond to the results of previous studies. No statistically significant differences were found regarding the QoL of the groups. There is an apparent advantage of neurolysis, over nerve repair, over TT procedure, both in terms of useful functional recovery, and foot-drop-related QoL. However, when involving all aspects of QoL, these advantages diminish. The individual approach leads to optimal results in all groups of patients.

Indexed as

outcomeperoneal nervequality of lifesurgerytrauma

Identifiers

PMID36451682
PMCPMC9702062
OpenAlexW4309012260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.