Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451677›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of microbiology2022

Activity-Based Screening of Soil Samples from Nyingchi, Tibet, for Amylase-Producing Bacteria and Other Multifunctional Enzyme Capacities.

J H Liu, J N Guo, H Lu, J Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J H LiuShanghai Engineering Research Center of Industrial Microorganisms, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tibet University-Fudan University Joint Laboratory for Biodiversity and Global Change,Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-5812
J N GuoShanghai Engineering Research Center of Industrial Microorganisms, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tibet University-Fudan University Joint Laboratory for Biodiversity and Global Change,Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0606-537X
H LuShanghai Engineering Research Center of Industrial Microorganisms, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tibet University-Fudan University Joint Laboratory for Biodiversity and Global Change,Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3449-8153
J LinShanghai Engineering Research Center of Industrial Microorganisms, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Tibet University-Fudan University Joint Laboratory for Biodiversity and Global Change,Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8608-9370
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the interest in Tibetan soil as a promising source of functional enzymes with potential biotechnological applications, few studies have considered the screening and identification of amylase producing bacteria from Tibetan soil. Amylase has many applications in the food and feed industries, textile and biofuel production, and biomedical engineering. The area of amylase with specific properties is attracting growing attention because of its better application to various industrial conditions. This study aims to screen and identify amylase-producing strains from soil samples collected in Nyingchi, Tibet, and then explore whether the bacterial isolates are superior for unique enzymes. In this paper, a total of 127 amylase producing bacteria were isolated by activity-based screening of six Tibetan soil samples. The 16S rRNA gene survey then identified four major phyla, namely, firmicutes, bacteroidetes, proteobacteria, and actinobacteria, which were differentiated into twelve genera with a dominance of

Identifiers

PMID36451677
PMCPMC9705117
OpenAlexW4309496567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.