ReviewCureus2022
A Systematic Review of 5110 Cases of Monkeypox: What Has Changed Between 1970 and 2022?
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monkeypox Virus Countermeasures: Vaccines, Antibodies, Drugs and Traditional Chinese Medicine.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Mpox virus infection in women and outbreak sex disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Monkeypox virus (MPXV): A Brief account of global spread, epidemiology, virology, clinical features, pathogenesis, and therapeutic interventions.Infectious medicine · 2023Review
- Features of Mpox infection: The analysis of the data submitted to the ID-IRI network.New microbes and new infections · 2023Article
- Unexpectedly higher levels of anti-orthopoxvirus neutralizing antibodies are observed among gay men than general adult population.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Interdisciplinary management of mpox-related local complications: report on a series of cases.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Sexual behaviors, cannabis, alcohol and monkeypox infection.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent monkeypox (MPVX) outbreak has been characterized by an unprecedented increase in cases, unlike any other outbreaks in the past. The disease pattern and transmissibility are also different from previous outbreaks. This systematic review aimed to evaluate whether the current outbreak has significant contrasting features from the previous ones, necessitating changes in prevention and control guidelines. A thorough literature search related to MPVX infection was performed on the online databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect using appropriate keywords "MPVX", "men who have sex with men (MSM)", "transmission", and "smallpox vaccination", for choosing relevant articles from the inception of MPVX in 1970 to August 31, 2022. We identified 5110 cases of MPVX, documented in 63 articles on MPVX. We discovered that the median age of MPVX infection has slowly increased since its inception, and currently, it is more common in adults. Compared to previous outbreaks, a significantly greater male preponderance is witnessed in the current outbreak. Only 238 (4.65%) out of the 5110 evaluated patients were vaccinated with the smallpox vaccine in our review. There were 107 mortalities, most of which were children below the age of 10 years. Out of the 1534 cases identified in 2022, 1134 (73.92%) patients admitted that they had been involved in sexual relations within the last 21 days (MSM/gay/bisexual). We found that in contrast to previous outbreaks, human-to-human transmission is more common in this outbreak, with most cases having no link with endemic countries. There are evolving traits and undetected transmission modes of MPVX infection that require new disease mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.