Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451546›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Comparative study of binding pocket structure and dynamics in cardiac and skeletal myosin.

Anna Katarina Antonovic, Julien Ochala, Arianna Fornili

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Katarina AntonovicSchool of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Julien OchalaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, København N 2200, Denmark; Centre of Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Arianna ForniliSchool of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.fornili@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of small molecule myosin modulators has seen an increased effort in recent years due to their possible use in the treatment of cardiac and skeletal myopathies. Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is the first-in-class cardiac myotrope and the first to enter clinical trials. Its selectivity toward slow/beta-cardiac myosin lies at the heart of its function; however, little is known about the underlying reasons for selectivity to this isoform as opposed to other closely related ones such as fast-type skeletal myosins. In this work, we compared the structure and dynamics of the OM binding site in cardiac and in fasttype IIa skeletal myosin to identify possible reasons for OM selectivity. We found that the different shape, size, and composition of the binding pocket in skeletal myosin directly affects the binding mode and related affinity of OM, which is potentially a result of weaker interactions and less optimal molecular recognition. Moreover, we identified a side pocket adjacent to the OM binding site that shows increased accessibility in skeletal myosin compared with the cardiac isoform. These findings could pave the way to the development of skeletal-selective compounds that can target this region of the protein and potentially be used to treat congenital myopathies where muscle weakness is related to myosin loss of function.

Indexed as

HeartMyosinsCardiac MyosinsMyocardiumProtein DomainsUreaCardiac MyosinsMyosinsUrea

Identifiers

PMID36451546
PMCPMC9822794
OpenAlexW4310290473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.