Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451512›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2022

Automated identification and quantification of traumatic brain injury from CT scans: Are we there yet?

Atsuhiro Hibi, Majid Jaberipour, Michael D Cusimano, Alexander Bilbily, Rahul G Krishnan, Richard I Aviv, Pascal N Tyrrell

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Atsuhiro HibiInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7558-0682
Majid JaberipourDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael D CusimanoInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexander BilbilyDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rahul G KrishnanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard I AvivDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Pascal N TyrrellInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2277-3824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review for understanding the availability and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that could automatically identify and quantify computed tomography (CT) findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI).

methodsSystematic review, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and SPIRIT-AI extension guidelines, with a search of 4 databases (Medline, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science) was performed to find AI studies that automated the clinical tasks for identifying and quantifying CT findings of TBI-related abnormalities.

resultsA total of 531 unique publications were reviewed, which resulted in 66 articles that met our inclusion criteria. The following components for identification and quantification regarding TBI were covered and automated by existing AI studies: identification of TBI-related abnormalities; classification of intracranial hemorrhage types; slice-, pixel-, and voxel-level localization of hemorrhage; measurement of midline shift; and measurement of hematoma volume. Automated identification of obliterated basal cisterns was not investigated in the existing AI studies. Most of the AI algorithms were based on deep neural networks that were trained on 2- or 3-dimensional CT imaging datasets.

conclusionWe identified several important TBI-related CT findings that can be automatically identified and quantified with AI. A combination of these techniques may provide useful tools to enhance reproducibility of TBI identification and quantification by supporting radiologists and clinicians in their TBI assessments and reducing subjective human factors.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrain Injuries, TraumaticHumansRadionuclide ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36451512
PMCPMC9704869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.