Observational studyMedicine2022
Content validity of the comprehensive home fall hazard checklist, an observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Psychometric Testing of the Patient Safety Scale for Home Peritoneal Dialysis (PD-PSS).Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2026Article
- Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the dry eye-related quality-of-life score questionnaire.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One strategy to reduce the number of falls in older adults is through home hazards assessment checklists. The comprehensive home fall hazard checklist (CHFHC) was designed to guide individuals through their home, assessing fall hazards. The checklist systematically prompts the individuals to check 10 general locations in the house The purpose of this study was to assess the content validity of the comprehensive home fall hazard checklist. A 4-point ordinal Likert rating scale was used to evaluate the content validity of each of the 74 items on the checklist. The relevance and clarity of each item was assessed. Nine experts rated the content validity of each test in relation to the 5 tasks in the rating protocol. The item content validity index, and the scale content validity index were determined, and a kappa rating was calculated. Three of the 74 items on the CHFHC were determined to be not relevant receiving a content validity index of 0.78 or less. All of the items were ranked as being quite clear or highly clear, with all items receiving at least 0.78 on the content validity index. The Kappa score indicates expert agreement. The content validity index was determined to be excellent, with high ratings for both relevance and clarity for 71 of 74 items on the CHFHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.