ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2022
Alterations in metamemory capacity and neural correlates in a subtype of subjective cognitive decline.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Loneliness, Depression, and Subjective Memory Complaints in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: The Role of Meaning in Life.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
- Visuospatial memory deficit, plasma p-tau217, and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio enhance sensitivity to identify Aβ PET positivity in individuals with SCD.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- Functional-structural co-dependent brain mapping of metamemory in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Episodic memory deficit in HIV infection: common phenotype with Parkinson's disease, different neural substrates.Brain structure & function · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsSubjective cognitive decline (SCD), one of the important clinical indicators for preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD), is primarily defined as self-perceived cognitive decline without objective evidence for cognitive impairment. However, the accuracy of their self-evaluation of cognition is unclear. This study sought to investigate the capacity for self-evaluation of own cognitive performance in SCD by applying an objective metamemory paradigm.
methods147 individuals with SCD were classified into four subgroups by their subjective feeling of worse performance than peers or not (P+/-) and whether they have objectively slight cognitive impairment compared to normative data (S+/-). Metamemory scores, the amplitude of the low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), fractional low-frequency fluctuation amplitude (fALFF), and cortical thickness were compared among four subgroups. Partial correlations between neuropsychological scores and neuroimaging measures were examined, controlling for age, sex, and education years.
resultsSCD S+P- showed the worst performance in short-term delayed recall and the worst metamemory performance, indicated by the highest value in the degree of confidence of short-term delayed recall (DOC-N4) and long-term cued recall (DOC-N6) and the worst value in relative accuracy of judgments of short-term delayed recall (ROJ-N4). ALFF values in the bilateral superior medial frontal and olfactory cortices and the left superior orbitofrontal gyrus cortex were significantly higher in SCD P- compared with SCD P+ groups (all P < 0.05, FWE-corrected, cluster-wise level). A significant S × P interaction effect in the left hippocampus and middle cingulate cortex was found for the fALFF signals (all P < 0.05, FWE-corrected, cluster-wise level). Significant interaction and main effects on cortical thickness were reported. The parahippocampal and posterior cingulate cortices were significantly decreased in SCD S+P- (all P < 0.05).
conclusionSCD S+P- showed the worst episodic memory performance, altered metamemory capacity (overconfidence and less accuracy of judgment), and altered neuroimaging measures, though they had feelings of similar performance with peers. Our results indicate that metamemory capacity is affected in a subtype of SCD with reduced cortical thickness and intensity of regional spontaneous activity in key areas for metamemory processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.