ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023
Modeling the impact of data sharing on variant classification.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional assay for assessment of pathogenicity of BAP1 variants.Human molecular genetics · 2024Article
- Using metabolic abnormalities of carriers in the neonatal period to evaluate the pathogenicity of variants of uncertain significance in methylmalonic acidemia.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Combining clinical and molecular characterization of CDH1: a multidisciplinary approach to reclassification of a splicing variant.Familial cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMany genetic variants are classified, but many more are variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Clinical observations of patients and their families may provide sufficient evidence to classify VUS. Understanding how long it takes to accumulate sufficient patient data to classify VUS can inform decisions in data sharing, disease management, and functional assay development. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur software models the accumulation of clinical evidence (and excludes all other types of evidence) to measure their unique impact on variant interpretation. We illustrate the time and probability for VUS classification when laboratories share evidence, when they silo evidence, and when they share only variant interpretations.
resultsUsing conservative assumptions for frequencies of observed clinical evidence, our models show the probability of classifying rare pathogenic variants with an allele frequency of 1/100 000 increases from less than 25% with no data sharing to nearly 80% after one year when labs share data, with nearly 100% classification after 5 years. Conversely, our models found that extremely rare (1/1 000 000) variants have a low probability of classification using only clinical data. DISCUSSION: These results quantify the utility of data sharing and demonstrate the importance of alternative lines of evidence for interpreting rare variants. Understanding variant classification circumstances and timelines provides valuable insight for data owners, patients, and service providers. While our modeling parameters are based on our own assumptions of the rate of accumulation of clinical observations, users may download the software and run simulations with updated parameters.
conclusionsThe modeling software is available at https://github.com/BRCAChallenge/classification-timelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.