Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36451264›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2023

Assessing the impact of privacy-preserving record linkage on record overlap and patient demographic and clinical characteristics in PCORnet®, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network.

Keith Marsolo, Daniel Kiernan, Sengwee Toh, Jasmin Phua, Darcy Louzao, Kevin Haynes, Mark Weiner, Francisco Angulo, Charles Bailey, Jiang Bian and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Privacy preserving record linkage for public health action: opportunities and challenges.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  14. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Keith MarsoloDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Daniel KiernanDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sengwee TohDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jasmin PhuaDatavant, San Francisco, California, USA.
Darcy LouzaoDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kevin HaynesScientific Affairs, HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
Mark WeinerDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5586-9940
Francisco AnguloDepartment of Medicine, Cook County Health and Hospital System, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Charles BaileyDepartment of Pediatrics, Applied Clinical Research Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Bioinformatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-5429
Daniel FortCenter for Outcomes and Health Services Research, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Shaun GrannisRegenstrief Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8093-6639
Ashok Kumar KrishnamurthyRenaissance Computing Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Vinit NairHumana, Sharon, Massachusetts, USA.
Pedro RiveraOCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jonathan SilversteinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Maryan ZirkleCohen Veterans Bioscience, New York, New York, USA.
Thomas CartonLouisiana Public Health Institute, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article describes the implementation of a privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL) solution across PCORnet®, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. MATERIAL AND

methodsUsing a PPRL solution from Datavant, we quantified the degree of patient overlap across the network and report a de-duplicated analysis of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the PCORnet population.

resultsThere were ∼170M patient records across the responding Network Partners, with ∼138M (81%) of those corresponding to a unique patient. 82.1% of patients were found in a single partner and 14.7% were in 2. The percentage overlap between Partners ranged between 0% and 80% with a median of 0%. Linking patients' electronic health records with claims increased disease prevalence in every clinical characteristic, ranging between 63% and 173%. DISCUSSION: The overlap between Partners was variable and depended on timeframe. However, patient data linkage changed the prevalence profile of the PCORnet patient population.

conclusionsThis project was one of the largest linkage efforts of its kind and demonstrates the potential value of record linkage. Linkage between Partners may be most useful in cases where there is geographic proximity between Partners, an expectation that potential linkage Partners will be able to fill gaps in data, or a longer study timeframe.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityPrivacyComputer SecurityDemographyElectronic Health RecordsHumansMedical Record LinkagePatient-Centered Caredistributed research networksprivacy-preserving record linkagereal-world data

Identifiers

PMID36451264
PMCPMC9933062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.